05/16/2002
Defending Ourselves from Asteroids
It was deja vu all over again. A couple weeks ago I mentioned attending a New York Philharmonic Orchestra concert that ended with Scriaban''s First Symphony and watching the Joseph Flummerfelt Choral Group sit stoically, maintaining a tight lipped silence for five of the six movements. Last week, it was a concert by our local symphony orchestra. Sure enough, the concert ended with Debussy''s Nocturnes and featured a choral group. The piece had three movements - Nuages, Fetes and Sirenes. This time the first two movements not only had no vocal elements but the singers were nowhere in sight. Finally, before Sirenes, the kettledrums were shifted aside to allow about 15 to 20 neatly attired women to file on stage in back of the orchestra and the last movement commenced. But what''s going on here? Scriaban gave the Flummerfelt group just one line to sing. These gals didn''t even have a line! As best I can transcribe it, all they sang was "Aaaahaaauuh" over and over. Were these compositions the forerunners of the limited lyrics found in much of the so-called music typical of the past few decades?
Speaking of deja vu, I''m afraid you''re in for another column on asteroid impacts. Immediately after posting last week''s column on the subject, I stumbled upon several articles dealing with these visitations by objects from outer space. One article in the March 2002 issue of Scientific American is titled "Repeated Blows" by Luann Becker a geochemist at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Her specialty is studying the markers, or tracers, that can be used to identify impact sites from the distant past. We''ll get back to her later.
The other two articles were more current and/or forward looking. One was a very short article by Fenella Saunders in the February 2002 Discover magazine that really heightened my concern about incoming missiles from outer space. According to the article, there is roughly 500 tons of debris from space raining down on us Earthlings every day. Not only that, but it seems that a meteor packing the punch of an atomic bomb hits us about once a year! This statement rather shocked me. I''m assuming that this energy is dissipated in the atmosphere or the ocean most of the time or else we would hear about these meteors a lot more frequently. Saunders mentions the work of Douglas ReVelle and colleagues, who use low-frequency monitoring stations around the world to pick up the sounds of the meteors as they charge through our atmosphere. This permits them to determine the location and speed of these wandering space objects. It heartens me to know that someone is watching out for us, even if the likelihood is nil that we can do anything about these meteors that show up and disappear very quickly.
Three articles that really shook me up appeared in the April 5, 2002 issue of Science. They dealt with Asteroid 1950 DA. On March 16, 2880, there is perhaps a 1 in 300 chance that we''ll be clobbered by this 1-kilometer size asteroid and its 10,000- megaton wallop. Ok, I agree, that''s over 800 years away and we probably shouldn''t lose any sleep worrying about it. I wouldn''t even have mentioned it except for the Yarkovsky effect. I never heard of Yarkovsky until I read these articles by Richard Kerr, by Joseph Spitale and by J. D. Giorgini and 13 other authors! (With that many authors on a single paper, you know this has got to be hot stuff.) I felt better after reading these articles. Apparently, there''s hope that we can defend ourselves from against these extinction-producing objects.
Yarkovsky is a Russian engineer who published a paper in Science back in 1999 that discussed what happens when a spinning asteroid goes in and out of the sunlight, just as we do every day here on earth. What he showed was that the "afternoon" section of an asteroid, which has been heated the most by the sun will give off thermal radiation. How much heat it emits depends on how hot the asteroid gets and this in turn is quite dependent on the surface. For example, if the surface is black it will absorb more sunlight than if it''s white. Who cares if it gives off thermal radiation? You might care a lot if you know the asteroid is headed your way!
This thermal radiation, in the form of photons of various wavelengths, acts like a bunch of teensy rockets pushing the asteroid ever so gently as that hot section of the asteroid spins into dusk and darkness. This tiny push, over a long period of time can steer an asteroid like our 1950 DA toward or away from us over the next 800 plus years. The Yarkovsky effect is a major reason that astronomers can''t say definitely that the asteroid will hit or miss us. To calculate more exactly what the effect will be, they need to know such things as the shape, color, surface roughness and spin rate. Fortunately, they have some time to get the needed data before 2880 arrives.
But what happens if they get the data and calculate that it''s going to hit us dead on? Spitale proposes that we use the Yarkovsky effect to get us out of this jam. He argues that it would only take a modification of the upper inch or so of the asteroid''s surface to modify how hot the surface gets. If we''re clever, we could change the Yarkovsky effect enough to nudge the asteroid out of its earthbound path. How do you accomplish such a feat? Spitale suggests that one could ferry a couple hundred thousand tons of dirt and dump it on 1950 DA. This, he figures, would take only about 90 Saturn rockets full of dirt. Other possibilities he considers are detonating conventional explosive to change the texture and color of the surface.
The article by Kerr suggests possibly covering the surface with soot or powdered chalk might do the trick. You can see that all these approaches require some degree of planning and execution, to put it mildly. Spitale suggests it could take a century to alter the course enough to make the difference. All this speculation is obviously for the future.
When it comes to past impacts, the situation is becoming much clearer, thanks to work such as that by Luann Becker and her colleagues. How does one identify the existence of an impact? The most obvious one is the existence of a very visible crater such as the one in Arizona that you may have seen in person. But more typically the impact crater is not so obvious and it takes some good detective work to pin the impact down. That''s where some sort of tracer is needed. We''ve discussed before the work by Luis Alvarez and his son Walter, who led the Berkeley team that in 1980 found unusually high amounts of the element iridium in a layer of 65 million-year old clay in Italy. Knowing that iridium is found in many meteorites and that the dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago, Alvarez proposed the connection between the two and the hunt was on for other tracers to confirm the hypothesis.
Soon it was clear that in the same time period there were tiny droplets of glass known as microspherules and of quartz that had been rudely pounded ("shocked" quartz). Both were attributable to a tremendous impact. Also, excessive amounts of soot and ash were found. All this circumstantial evidence provided by the tracers was neatly confirmed by geophysicists from an oil company who found that there was a circular formation in the Gulf of Mexico about 110 miles in diameter, just the size impact crater that would be expected.
Becker and her group have found another convincing tracer. As we''ve discussed earlier, one of the hottest fields around today is the study of fullerenes, new forms of carbon that include the so- called buckyball. This is a form of carbon in which the unit of crystal structure is 60 carbon atoms arranged as in a soccer ball. If you picture a soccer ball, you can visualize that there is room inside the soccer ball to trap a tennis ball or two. Similarly, a carbon buckyball can trap other atoms or molecules inside. Becker''s group found that, at a known impact crater in Canada, there were fullerenes and that inside the structure there was helium. Just as there is ordinary hydrogen and also a heavier form (isotope) known as deuterium, there are different isotopes of helium. On Earth, there is a certain ratio of the amounts of two of these isotopes. In the Canadian crater, the buckyballs contained helium in which the ratio was vastly different. In fact, the ratio was similar to that found for helium in some meteorites and cosmic dust. As usual there are skeptics who think volcanoes may be involved but I''m a believer.
I promise no more asteroid impacts for the next few months unless, of course, one hits us! Next week, the foul shot and other weighty matters.
Allen F. Bortrum
|