08/08/2002
Cold Weather Ahead?
Mea culpa. I goofed. If you read last week''s column before 2:30 PM on August 3rd, you found a statement that lithium iodide was being sold or distributed to counter the effects of any radioactive iodine released in a nuclear accident or terrorist attack. My brother Conrad, an expert in the field of radiation damage to us humans, called my attention to the fact that the compound is potassium iodide, not lithium iodide. Thank you, Conrad. What disturbs me most is that, prior to writing the column, I had received many e-mail solicitations urging me to purchase potassium iodide as insurance against a nuclear disaster. Could it be the stifling heat or simply senile dementia that addled my brain? I prefer to think it was the heat.
We''re inclined these days to blame lots of things on the heat generated by global warming. The existence of global warming is becoming more and more an accepted fact in the scientific community and, more reluctantly, among our political leaders. Is it already too late to take remedial measures to slow or halt the warming trend? With the temperature outside hovering near 100 degrees Fahrenheit, I was startled to come across an article suggesting that we may very shortly enter a new ice age. Even more startling, the unlikely culprit is global warming!
The article, "The New Ice Age", is by Brad Lemley in the September issue of Discover magazine. I also found some informative articles on the most recent ice age by Scott Mandia, a professor at Suffolk County Community College in New York, on the Web site ww2.sunysuffolk.edu. That ice age was not like the big one of some 12,000 years ago during which much of the Northern Hemisphere was covered with the mother of all ice sheets. I''m referring here to the so-called Little Ice Age that had devastating effects in Europe as recently as the 1800s.
The 300-year Little Ice Age spanned the period from 1560 to 1850 and spawned famines, floods, killer storms and other tragic events. For example, the cool, wet summers apparently promoted the growth of various forms of fungus in stored grain. One of these, ergot blight, causes a disease known as ergotism, also known as St. Anthony''s fire. Sometimes affecting whole villages, the disease caused convulsions, hallucinations and gangrene. Ergot blight has even been suggested as a cause of the Salem witchcraft hysteria in Massachusetts. Surprisingly, a disease normally found in the tropics, malaria, was a major cause of death in Chaucer''s and Shakespeare''s times in parts of England. If you see the term "ague" in their writings that was the term for malaria in those days. Ague did in Oliver Cromwell in 1658, one of the coldest years of the Little Ice Age. Apparently, those cool, wet summers also allowed the mosquitoes that spread malaria to flourish.
Some storms and floods were so severe that more than a hundred thousand people would die in a single storm. Malnutrition, resulting from the cold weather''s influence on agriculture and the resulting poor crop yields, is thought to have caused the malnourished to have compromised immune systems. With limited immunity, diseases such as the Bubonic Plaque may have caused more deaths than they would have in normal times. All in all, it seems prudent to pay attention to the possibility that a little ice age is just around the corner. You might say, "Come on, it won''t happen overnight and, besides, we''re smarter than people were in those days and we should be able to adjust." Would you be a bit more concerned if an ice age was only ten years away?!
That very possibility has been posed by workers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod in Massachusetts and is the subject of Lemley''s article. I''ve seen quite a number of articles over the past decade reporting new data on climate histories all over the world. The data range from ice cores in Greenland to cores taken from the bottom of the oceans to analyses of tree rings from very old trees. The startling conclusion from many of these studies is that the climate can turn on a dime, geologically speaking. Drastic climate changes have occurred very quickly, with little or no warning.
Take that famous painting of George Washington and his troops crossing the Delaware River in the winter of 1776. Woods Hole''s William Curry points out that those troops aren''t rowing but are pushing away the ice from the boats. Curry, who lived in Philadelphia, not far from the spot depicted in the painting, says nothing like this is seen on the Delaware these days. Washington crossed the Delaware during the Little Ice Age. While Europe suffered the brunt of that age, it apparently was colder here also.
What caused that and other prolonged and suddenly appearing cold periods? Proposed causes include variations in the output of energy from our Sun or volcanic eruptions. Another factor that may play a role is the earth''s albedo, that is, its reflectivity. If a cooling trend leads to more of the earth being covered with snow and ice, that snow and ice reflect more of the sun''s energy back to space. This would cool the earth down further and more snow/ice cover would result in more cooling etc., etc. Volcanic eruptions can certainly influence the temperature over wide areas. Witness the cooling that resulted for a couple of years after Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines erupted a decade ago. Recorded sunspot activity has been correlated with solar energy output; some data suggest a correlation of the sunspot activity with cold periods.
But what prompts Terrence Joyce of Woods Hole to worry that a little ice age, or at least a major cooling trend, could be only 10 years away? As you might expect from an oceanographic institution, the Woods Hole researchers are concerned about another factor - ocean currents. Specifically, they talk about the "thermohaline circulation" and the "Great Ocean Conveyor". The latter is the huge global current pattern that carries cold deep water from the North Atlantic Ocean around the globe to the Indian and Pacific Oceans, where it rises and returns as warm surface water all the way back to the North Atlantic.
We call the section of that warm current skirting the East Coast of the U.S. the Gulf Stream. As it flows north, the Gulf Stream gives up its heat along the way. As it cools down, the water becomes denser and, in the upper reaches of the North Atlantic, sinks down a mile or more into the depths of the ocean. This is called the thermohaline circulation. After sinking down, the cold water begins its journey down to the region of Antarctica and over to the Pacific Ocean as part of the Global Ocean Conveyer.
So, what''s the problem? Over the past three decades, large "rivers" of freshwater have poured into the North Atlantic. The suspected cause of this sudden inflow of freshwater is melting of Arctic icecaps due to global warming. Why worry about it? This mass of freshwater is comparable to a huge thermal blanket that makes it harder for the cooled Gulf Stream water to sink. The concern is this freshwater could (a) shift the course of the Gulf Stream southward, or (b) even worse, shut down the thermohaline circulation completely.
Either scenario means trouble. The Woods Hole researchers believe that, while part of the heat from the Gulf Stream helps to heat North America, most of it gets blown off towards Europe. This may be one reason why Rome, for example, is so much warmer in winter than Boston, which lies at the same latitude as the Eternal City. While global warming might be heating up the Earth as a whole by small fractions of a degree Fahrenheit each year, the effect in the North Atlantic region could be much greater in the opposite direction. How about a 10 degree drop just ten years from today? Ruth Curry of Woods Hole suggests that if this happens, it could take hundreds of years to return back to today''s "normal" climate. Global warming will have caused a new ice age.
There''s always someone to pooh-pooh any theory. In the opinion of Richard Seager of Columbia University''s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, the Gulf Stream plays a minor role in heating up Europe in the winter. He feels that Europe would be warmer than we are "even if the Atlantic were just a big stagnant ocean". His view of the future is that European winters will become warmer and warmer as global warming continues.
So, the battle lines are drawn. At age 74, I doubt that I shall see which of these views is correct. However, you Boomers and your offspring may want to hedge your bets. Take advantage of the hot weather and summer sales to purchase that mink coat and other winter garb to store away for 2012, just in case!
Allen F. Bortrum
|