07/10/2003
Of Planets and Nanotubes
In the past we’ve talked about things big and small, ranging from universes to impossibly tiny strings. It’s too hot and humid to worry ourselves with such overwhelming concepts, so let’s settle for a couple of items somewhat smaller and somewhat larger, respectively. I’ve written a number of times about two such topics, specifically planets outside our solar system, so-called exoplanets, and about tiny nanotubes of carbon that have been touted as a replacement for the silicon chip when it’s been miniaturized to its limit.
Our July 4th newspaper, The Star Ledger, contained an AP dispatch that dealt with a conference in Paris titled “Extrasolar Planets: Today and Tomorrow”. At the conference, Hugh Jones of Liverpool John Moores University reported the discovery of a Jupiter-like planet circling the star HD 70642 in the constellation Puppis. I hadn’t heard of either HD 70642 or of Puppis and at first thought this was old stuff since the Anglo-Australian team of which Jones is a member has turned up Jupiter-like planets before. Indeed, the number of planets discovered outside our solar system now is over 100.
Typically, these planets have orbits very close to their star or there’s another big planet stuck in between the outer planet and the star. The latter planet would sweep out or in any earth-like planet that was in the vicinity. Or the star isn’t much like our sun. In general, these scenarios are not very conducive to an earth being somewhere in an orbit that would be friendly to the existence of life as we know it. This latest planet is roughly twice as heavy as Jupiter and orbits its star in a circular orbit at a bit over three times the distance from our earth to the sun. HD 70642 is comparable to our sun and there’s no intervening large planet between the big planet and HD 70642. This is exciting because it’s the closest we’ve come to finding a planetary system that potentially could harbor an earth nestled in closer to its sun. As it stands, we can hope that, when more powerful telescopes are put in service, they might detect another planet like our own out there in Puppis some 90 light-years away.
Now let’s turn to the other end of the size scale with the carbon single-walled nanotube (SWNT). To review, think of chicken wire with its wires twisted into a pattern of hexagons. Roll up a piece of chicken wire into a tube and it’s like a carbon SWNT, except that the SWNT will have closed ends with a few pentagons sneaked into the structure. We have talked about graphite a number of times over the years. Graphite is sort of like layers of chicken wire with the layers of carbon atoms held together weakly, allowing the layers to rub off on the paper when you write with your graphite pencil. An SWNT is like rolling up a layer of graphite.
One of the exciting features of SWNTs is that slight twists or kinks in the structure of SWNTs can lead to quite different properties. For example, certain SWNTs conduct electricity like metals while other SWNTs are not good conductors but conduct electricity like semiconductors. This excites circuit designers who can imagine transistors made of semiconducting SWNTs and/or electrical connections also made of metallic SWNTs. Utopia might be a chip with semiconductor SWNT transistors connected by “wires” of metallic SWNTs. We would be in the Carbon Age after being in the Silicon Age the past 50 years or so.
The path to realizing this dream is fraught with obstacles and challenges. One is simply the tiny size of SWNTs and the difficulty in handling them. For example, SWNTs are usually made by some sort of electrical or laser zapping of carbon in some form, be it graphite or a carbon compound. What typically results are “ropes” of nanotubes bunched together like handfuls of soda straws or worse. The individual nanotubes have this attraction for each other that causes them to bunch up. In these bunches of SWNTs there are both forms, the metallic and the semiconducting types. Separation of the mix into piles of metallic and piles of semiconducting SWNTs has been pretty much impossible. Robert Service, in the June 27 issue of Science, reports that there may be a breakthrough in the separation and handling of these SWNTs.
Some German physicists, Ralph Krupke and Hilbert von Lohneysen, combined with chemists Frank Hennrich and Manfred Kappes to come up with a simple technique. As usual in science, their scheme was spurred by earlier work reported in Science in July last year by Richard Smalley and his group at Rice University. (Smalley is one of the a founding father of the field of carbon fullerenes, of which SWNTs are an example.) His group found they could use ultrasound to blast a solvent containing the SWNT bundles and unbundle them to create a suspension of individual SWNTs. This at least separates the SWNTs but the semiconducting and metallic SWNTs still are all mixed up.
Here’s where the German workers come in. They decided to put a couple of electrodes in the solution. If you hook up a battery, one of the electrodes is positively and the other negatively charged. The electrons in the nanotubes will be attracted to the positive electrode, setting up positive charges at the other end of the tube attracted to the negative electrode. This separation of charges is called a “dipole”. These “induced” dipoles result in the nanotubes near either one of the electrodes to be attracted to it. If it’s close enough the nanotube will latch on to the electrode. You rightly say, “Big deal. You’ve got the SWNTs on the electrodes but they’re still mixed up.”
But Krupe and his co-workers weren’t stupid. They knew that electrons in metals fairly fly through the material, whereas electrons in semiconductors are relatively sluggish in moving about. So, instead of a battery, let’s put an alternating current across the electrodes. And let’s not use the ordinary 60 cycles per second household AC. Instead let’s cycle the current back and forth millions of times a second. Well, those poor electrons in the semiconductor barely get going one way when they’re pulled back the other way. The electrons in the metals, however, think it’s a great ride, zipping back and forth like crazy, the induced dipoles flipping accordingly. If the metallic nanotube happens to be near an electrode it’s attracted to it and sticks. The semiconducting nanotubes remain in the solvent, wandering about aimlessly.
Kappes says that they’ve separated mixtures in minutes and Smalley hails the new technique as long overdue and predicts it will be quite useful. Lest you think the Carbon Age is now just around the corner, hold your enthusiasm. So far the technique has only been used to separate picograms of material. I hesitate to remind you of what a picogram is. It’s a mere trillionth of a gram, like a speck of dust. To put it mildly, there’s a ways to go before the method is scaled up to a commercially viable process,
As I said, there are still many obstacles to be overcome and challenges to be met before we enter the Carbon Age but hey, the longest journey begins with…………
Allen F. Bortrum
|