01/05/2005
Tadpoles
The arrival of a new year typically prompts reflections on the events of the past year, which in this case ended with tragedy on a monumental scale. Amidst all the death and destruction there are remarkable tales of survival, one of which I heard on the radio this morning. Station WOR in New York had an interview with a woman in nearby Livingston, New Jersey. She, her husband and their children were in Phuket, Thailand and she was sitting by the hotel’s pool when she saw the first of three huge waves coming. The last was the biggest wave and she found herself washed up in a tree. Her husband was washed through a glass door in the hotel and one child was banged around in their hotel room.
Looking down from the tree, she saw the rushing water pick up another of her children, about to be carried out to sea. The husband heard his wife’s screams and ran out, cutting his feet on the broken glass, and somehow managed to grab the child from the water. The lucky family is back here in New Jersey and the woman had nothing but kind words about how wonderful the Thai people were to them. The tsunami disaster is so large and so distant, yet so close to home.
What was the major scientific story of 2004? The editors and staff of Discover magazine chose an environmental topic and on the cover of the January 2005 issue they pose the question, “Is there any way to turn down the heat?” In the associated article, “Turning Point” by Robert Kunzig, the year 2004 is cited as the year in which the evidence of global warming became so overwhelming that we now have face whether or not we can do anything about it. Numerous small pieces of evidence, together with the demolishing of some arguments against or even favoring global warming as a good thing, combine to provide strong reasons for trying to control it.
One of the small bits of evidence is the lowly southern green stinkbug! Not the stinkbug itself, but rather its newfound habitat in England. This stinkbug has flourished in the milder climes of Europe and would often appear in shipments of foodstuffs from Italy to England. However, the bugs found the summers in England too cool for their tastes and never reproduced. Now, suddenly, stinkbugs are being found in gardens in the London vicinity. This bit of evidence certainly doesn’t in itself warrant any conclusion about global warming. On the other hand, when combined with other similar findings on expanded ranges of other animals and plants, earlier planting seasons, the hottest 20th century and a host of other changes, global warming cannot be ignored.
Some have argued that global warming could be a good thing in that it might help prevent another Ice Age. That argument seems to have been dealt a body blow last year by some European researchers who extracted a two-mile deep ice core from a spot in Antarctica. Their conclusion from their analyses of the climate history in the core is that it will be about 15,000 years before we have to worry about an Ice Age. If worst case global warming scenarios come true, places like South Florida will have long since disappeared thanks to melting of ice sheets in Antarctica.
Global warming has been suggested as one of the possible causes of an alarming decline in the world’s population of frogs. My wife loves frogs, has sculpted them and one of her Christmas presents was a tiny frog sculpture. The December 17 2004 issue of Science reports that some 500 herpetologists took part in a global assessment of amphibians and their predictions do not bode well for the future. Perhaps half of the known 5700 species of amphibians could be gone by the end of this century.
Mention of frogs reminds me of the rebroadcast I watched on PBS of the Nobel Peace Prize award ceremony honoring Wangari Maathi, the African woman who won the award for planting trees! This may not seem something to warrant a Nobel Peace Prize unless it be noted that through her efforts some 30 million trees have been planted in Africa, primarily by poor women, in the so-called Green Belt initiative. Women in rural Africa apparently do the work of growing the crops, carrying the water, gathering the firewood, etc. Deforestation resulted in water sources drying up and the women having to walk farther for wood and water.
About thirty years ago, Maathi reasoned that, to reclaim the food and water resources from the expanding desert and other eroded land resulting from the clearing of jungle habitat, a good first step would be to plant trees. A champion of women’s rights, she also thought that women could do the planting and be rewarded for their efforts. This Green Belt approach spread over Africa and other parts of the world.
Acknowledging the unusual awarding of the Peace Prize specifically for an environmental activity, the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee took pains to point out the role of the environment in conflicts all over the world. The distribution and availability of oil and water underlie conflicts in the Middle East; deforestation in the Philippines and the Chiapas region of Mexico underlie conflicts in those regions; the spread of desert forced contacts between conflicting groups in Darfur. There are many causes of conflict but inequities in distribution of essential resources, especially food and water, are virtually bound to cause conflict.
Returning to the frog, its numbers are declining all over the world. Whether due to global warming or pollution by toxic chemicals or some other causes, it may be likened to the canary in the coalmine warning of impending danger to our own existence. I was touched by Maathi’s concluding remarks in her Nobel address (the Nobel Web site Nobelprize.org contains the full text):
“As I conclude I reflect on my childhood experience when I would visit a stream next to our home to fetch water for my mother. I would drink water straight from the stream. Playing among the arrowroot leaves I tried in vain to pick up the strands of frogs’ eggs, believing they were beads. But every time I put my little fingers under them they would break. Later, I saw thousands of tadpoles: black, energetic and wriggling through the clear water against the background of the brown earth. This is the world I inherited from my parents.
Today, over 50 years later, the stream has dried up, women walk long distances for water, which is not always clean, and children will never know what they have lost. The challenge is to restore the home of the tadpoles and give back to our children a world of beauty and wonder.”
Since last we met, I’ve added another year to my official age, now 77. However, I still remember playing in a stream and watching tadpoles wriggling in clear water. Let’s hope we meet the challenge.
Allen F. Bortrum
|