10/12/2005
Battling the Water
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it. Our part of New Jersey has been suffering from a drought and we’ve all been wishing for rain. All the remnants of this year’s hurricanes passed either to the west or to the east of us and other storms split when they approached, leaving us high and dry. Tropical storm Tammy’s remnants did none of those things and dumped as much as 9 to 12 inches of precip in certain parts of Jersey and we certainly got our share. As a result, on Saturday night my wife and were manning a towel brigade in our basement mopping up the encroaching H2O. Reluctantly following a suggestion by my wife, I also found myself outside in a drenching downpour in the dark with a hoe in hand trying to make a trench to divert water away from a corner where a major pool of water had formed.
Fortunately, our towels and possibly my hoeing stemmed the tide of the flooding in the basement and, thanks to Doppler radar and our local weather channel, we went to sleep assured that the deluge would be over shortly. The next morning, the Sunday papers headlined the horrible earthquake in the Pakistan-India region and the deadly mudslides in Guatemala. These tragedies and the devastation caused by Katrina and Rita certainly put our minor problem with Tammy in perspective.
The last time we had water in our basement was several years ago when we were in Amsterdam and, unbeknownst to us, our town had 8 inches of rain in one day. We came home to find the large carpet from our basement rec room in our driveway, carried up there wet by our artist, Harry Trumbore! I hadn’t planned to write anything more about hurricanes and the Gulf coast but the September 16 issue of Science had articles about hurricanes and possible approaches to reconstruction of New Orleans and its environs. There was an Amsterdam connection in an article by John Bohannon and Martin Enserink on the “Dutch Solution” to keeping out the sea from The Netherlands, half of which (including Amsterdam) is below sea level and sinking.
The Netherlands had its own version of Katrina back in 1953 when a North Sea storm breached neglected dikes. The flooding killed 1800 people. The Dutch responded by building a bunch of dams, storm surge barriers and dikes over a period of more than four decades in a project known as the Delta Works. The dikes protecting the most heavily populated regions are claimed to be able to hold up against all but a once-in-ten thousand-years storm, according to Bohannon and Enserink. That sounds pretty good unless you just happen to be there for the “big one”.
How about those big ones? We recently talked about hurricanes being more intense if they pass over warm waters and the possible influence of global warming. In another paper, Peter Webster of the Georgia Institute of Technology and his colleagues have examined closely examined the worldwide data on tropical cyclones (call them hurricanes or typhoons, the effects are the same) over the past 35 years. They’ve broken out the number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes, lumping them in one category, lumping the category 2 and 3 storms in a second category and the category 1 hurricanes as a class by themselves.
Looking at a plot of the number of hurricanes in each category over the period of 1970 through 2004, the three weaker category storms show no striking trend. However, the number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes jumped significantly. To illustrate this, the researchers divided the data into two 15-year periods, 1970 to 1989 and 1990 to 2004. In our North Atlantic basin, the number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes jumped from 16 in the 1970-1989 period to 25 in the 1990-2004 period. In the Western Pacific basin, the number jumped from 85 to 116 category 4 and 5 storms. In the Indian Ocean basin, the number more than doubled, from 24 to 57! By comparison, we in the eastern half of the United States get off relatively easily.
Bottom line – it’s clear that the number of intense storms is on the rise worldwide. Webster and his coauthors are careful to point out that, although the data are consistent with global warming, there isn’t a long enough history of data on worldwide numbers and intensities of hurricanes to nail down global warming as the culprit. Whatever the case, we certainly aren’t making things better by settling on the coasts, ensuring major trauma from any strong storm.
Which brings us back to New Orleans and The Netherlands. Would the Delta Works model work in the Mississippi delta? Would a storm surge barrier work to seal off Lake Pontchartrain? New Orleans is different from The Netherlands. It has this huge river constrained by those levees. The silt that used to build up the delta and build up those barrier islands now gets dumped into the Gulf of Mexico. Without all that stuff to build them up and sustain them, the barrier islands and the wetlands have been eroding away. Barrier islands are called by that name because they are indeed barriers that help protect land onshore from strong storms.
John Day, an ecologist at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge, has been leading a study started in 2000 in which they are diverting part of the Mississippi River into the wetlands. The level of the land is rising at 1 centimeter a year, less than half an inch. Day says that’s enough to compensate for rising sea levels. But there’s another problem. Like Venice, New Orleans is sinking and probably will have sunk another 3 feet or so by the end of the century. What to do about that? One approach is to raise the level of the New Orleans bowl. One method for doing this has been suggested by Roel Boumans, a fellow who got his Ph.D. at LSU and is now at the University of Vermont in Burlington. Boumans says why not pipe in the sediment from the Mississippi and build up the bottom of the New Orleans bowl until it’s at sea level?
That’s obviously a pretty ambitious project and he figures it would take another 50 to 60 years. What to do in the meantime? Build houses on stilts and/or build them so they float! Turn New Orleans into a Venice or a semi-Venice. In a sense, that’s what Amsterdam is. It has canals, streetcars, autos and lots of bicycles. It appears that we have a controversy over the best use of the Mississippi sediment - build up the city or build up the barrier islands. With all the money that will be thrown at solving the problem of New Orleans, the fights over what should be done to rebuild New Orleans are already starting and should last for years to come.
The Netherlands has its own controversies, with some advocating living only on higher ground or mounds or floating cities, “embracing the water” as Prof. Henk Saeijs at Erasmus University in Rotterdam puts it. On the other hand, hydraulics engineer Han Vrijling at Delft Technical University says that embracing the water approach is just a “romantic” notion. He is comfortable living with putting up higher dikes in a sinking country.
Oh well, it’s good to live here in suburban New Jersey, where a bit of water in the basement or the threat of another terrorist attack in nearby New York make for as exciting a life as old Bortrum cares to experience. It''s still raining!
Allen F. Bortrum
|