07/13/2005
Expanding and Contracting Dust Clouds
In contrast to humanity’s evil side shown in the explosions in London last week, the July 4th Deep Impact explosion on the comet Tempel 1 demonstrates one of the finer human endeavors, the exploration of our surroundings and the search for our roots. Clearly, the formation of our solar system was crucial to providing a home for our ancestors and us. How do solar systems form and what is the stuff from which they are formed? Tempel 1 is thought to be composed of the same stuff that formed our solar system.
A July 8 joint JPL/NASA/University of Maryland press release gives some data on the impact. (Michael A’Hearn of the U. of Maryland is the Deep Impact Principal Investigator.) The 820- pound Deep Impact probe slammed into the roughly 3- by 7-mile potato-shaped comet at a 25 degree angle to its surface at a speed of about 23,000 miles an hour. The result was a huge cloud of powdery dust expanding into space at 3 miles a second. The material in the cloud was like talcum powder, not like grains of sand or pebbles. If the comet is composed of such powdery material, how does it hang together in its travels through space? One of the Deep Impact scientists, Pete Schultz of Brown University, says you have to realize that the comet spends its time undisturbed in the vacuum of deep space. When it gets near the Sun, the Sun cooks off some of the material to form the fan- shaped coma we typically see around a comet.
The fan is, however, mostly show with lots of light but little substance, more like a fog. More substantial particles shed from a comet don’t get fanned out but form a debris trail that follows the comet in its orbit. This debris consists of small chunks of material millimeters or centimeters in size, more like pebbles. The debris trail particles are too small to be detected by optical telescopes; however, there’s a telescope out in space that can see these debris trails. It’s the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is equipped to detect infrared radiation. The “pebbles” in the debris trail pick up heat from the Sun and reradiate the heat in the form of infrared radiation.
The infrared radiation picked up by Spitzer complements the visible light sent back from the Hubble Space Telescope, X-ray data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory and gamma-ray data from the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory. (These four space telescopes form NASA’s Great Observatories Program, while Spitzer is also part of NASA’s Astronomical Search for Origins Program aimed at searching for our cosmic roots.) The long wavelength infrared radiation can travel through dust and gas clouds in space unhindered. Thus we can see things out in deep space that can’t be seen in visible light because of intervening dust clouds. Similarly, a report from the National Gallery in London last week told how an infrared technique was used to peer through one of Leonardo Da Vinci’s paintings to reveal a heretofore-unknown sketch on the canvas under his painting.
Spitzer was launched in August of 2003 and has performed brilliantly, finding much more important things than the debris trails of comets. Spitzer really shines when it looks out in space and sees stars with clouds of dust and gas spinning around them. If you see a star surrounded by a disk of dust and gas, that’s the recipe for forming a solar system. With luck, there might even be planets already formed or in the process of forming. Here’s where Spitzer’s infrared telescope has an advantage over the Hubble’s visible light telescope. (NASA’s Spitzer Web site has lots of information on the technical aspects of the mission.)
Looking at an incipient solar system in visible light, the star is thousands of times brighter than the light reflected from the dust or any planets. This makes it very hard to see a dimly lit planet, so outshined by its star. Temperature-wise, however, the star is likely to be only a few hundred times hotter than its planet(s). Remember, it’s heat that is associated with infrared radiation. In an article titled “How Nature Builds a Planet” in the July issue of Discover magazine, Adam Frank of the University of Rochester describes the excitement last summer when he and his colleagues first analyzed Spitzer infrared data on a “baby” star named Cohen-Kui Tau/4 (CKT/4). CKT/4, some 420 light-years from Earth, has a dusty disk around it.
Let’s get a bit technical and see what they found. If CKT/4 did not have a dusty disk but was a “naked” star, what would the infrared data look like? Just as we can split our Sun’s visible light into its spectrum of different wavelengths, the familiar rainbow of colors, Spitzer obtains the spectrum of the infrared radiation at different wavelengths. Each wavelength corresponds to a temperature; shorter wavelengths come from hotter regions, longer wavelengths from cooler regions. When you plot the energy of the infrared radiation for the different wavelengths you get smooth curve that has a hump or a smooth peak.
That’s for a naked star. What about a star with a dusty disk? Well, the dust/gas in the disk will obviously be cooler than the star. It will also be hottest near the center, closest to the star. So, the disk should emit longer wavelength infrared radiation, the shortest wavelengths coming from the regions of the disk closest to the star. Let’s go back to last summer at the University of Rochester, where researchers Dan Watson and Bill Forrest in Adam Frank’s group had worked on the spectrograph and camera for Spitzer.
Watson was peering over the shoulder of student Joel Green, who was plotting CKT/4 data from Spitzer. There was the hump from the star and the longer wavelength radiation from the disk. But wait, something was missing – the expected radiation from the hotter part of the disk near the center was not there. There was joy in Rochester – Watson realized immediately they had found a planet! When a planet forms, it “cleans out” the dust and gas around it by either incorporating the dust as it grows or it pushes the dust away and the dust eventually ends up falling into the star. The planet has created an empty gap in the disk; hence, no radiation.
You might greet the finding of another planet with a yawn. After all, we’ve talked before about finding planets and there are now at least 150 or so known planets outside our solar system. What really excited the researchers was that CKT/4 was a young star, only a million years old. They figure the planet circling CKT/4 formed a mere few hundred thousand years ago. The finding made the theorists rethink their models for how solar systems form. Some models predict solar systems can form rapidly; other models predict very slowly. Which is correct?
Spitzer has now looked at many stars with dusty disks and the conclusion is that things are really messy out there. They’ve found young stars with no disks and really old stars with massive disks. Some old stars known to have planets have disks with a hundred times more dust than in our solar system. Asteroid belts have been found, one 25 times denser than our own asteroid belt. We still have dust in our solar system from comets breaking up and asteroids banging into each other. This dust is making its way into the Sun and you can see it as a cone of so-called zodiacal light hanging in the west after sunset.
Frankly, I don’t see why anyone should be surprised that forming solar systems is so messy. If you look at pictures from Hubble, Spitzer and other telescopes of those dusty/gassy clouds where all the new stars are being born or have been born, it’s clear that there are dense clouds and sparse clouds. It seems to me that if you have lots of dust and gas, you could form planets fast and vice versa. In addition, with stars blowing up and shooting jets of stuff into space and some stars and planets banging into each other, you never know what sort of stuff might barge into the act. With all that uncertainty, we’re certainly lucky our solar system formed the way it did!
Allen F. Bortrum
|