10/23/2003
Technological Proliferation
The following is reprinted with the permission of Defense News; personally, my favorite publication. Special thanks to Elisha G. at Army Times Publishing Company.
This editorial was written days before China’s historic space mission last week and approaches the story from a slightly different angle than I have been expounding on in recent “Week in Review” columns.
BT
---
China’s Space Program
The scheduled launch of China’s first astronaut into space later this month aboard Shenzhou 5 should prompt Western nations to question the foundations of the global export control system.
For decades, nations with advanced technologies have sought to keep them from less advanced countries seen as potential adversaries. In some cases, it has worked.
Will this approach continue to work? It’s unlikely in China’s case.
Since the launch of its first satellite in 1970, China has worked to put a man in space – an effort that furnished yet another opportunity for superpower rivalry. Russia helped train Chinese astronauts and furnished technology for its manned program, while the United States and its allies worked to control Beijing’s access to space technologies.
But the United States may have been unable even to prevent its own firms from slipping valuable technologies to China. In 1998, allegations swirled that China gained key technologies from American firms, technologies that could improve Beijing’s ballistic missiles and manned spacecraft alike.
And little attention was paid to a more important source of knowledge gain: the thousands of specialists who have been trained at the world’s leading scientific centers, earning advanced degrees and intimate insights into critical technologies.
Is it any surprise that these Chinese students, after studying at the knees of Nobel laureates, would succeed in developing what others have tried to deny them?
There are military implications to space flight. Yuri Gagarin’s April 1961 flight, mankind’s first journey into orbit, transmitted a clear and ominous message to Washington: If Moscow could put an 11,000-pound spacecraft into orbit, it could lob a nuclear device onto U.S. soil.
Whereas the U.S.-Soviet space race was one of so many Cold War battlegrounds, the Chinese venture is different.
Shenzhou 5 shows the ambition and exploratory zeal of a proud and ancient nation that wants to demonstrate its coming of age in a high-tech world. China wants to become the third nation to loft a person into space, but also the second to land a man on the moon and the first to colonize it.
In the process, China helps disprove the notion that, in this world of instant communications and ready access to powerful technologies, leading nations can stop less developed ones from achieving ambitious technological goals – like putting man in space.
As the United States and other countries have sought to restrict the flow of technologies with military applications, from supercomputers to hydraulic tubing to superfast electronic switches, they have been giving Chinese students the intellectual tools to fend for themselves.
Moreover, if the world community has been unable to deter Iraq, Iran and North Korea – all relatively poor and small nations – from acquiring deadly technologies, how can it stop a determined nation of 1.2 billion that is growing richer by the day?
It can’t. In fact, it can be argued that such restrictive practices, particularly in the case of the United States, have done more to hurt American industry than Chinese aims. And intelligence officials maintain that the best way to keep tabs on what Beijing is really up to in space is through cooperation, without which gauging the progress of China’s secret programs is, to put it charitably, difficult.
So policy-makers must reconsider their approach to proliferation, and figure out how to engage developing nations that possess the economic and scientific capacity that can serve either the loftiest of peaceful, or the darkest of military, aims.
---
Hott Spotts will return October 30 more on China.
Brian Trumbore
|