Stocks and News
Home | Week in Review Process | Terms of Use | About UsContact Us
   Articles Go Fund Me All-Species List Hot Spots Go Fund Me
Week in Review   |  Bar Chat    |  Hot Spots    |   Dr. Bortrum    |   Wall St. History
Stock and News: Hot Spots
  Search Our Archives: 
 

 

Wall Street History

https://www.gofundme.com/s3h2w8

AddThis Feed Button

   

03/10/2000

Charles Keating, Part II

As we pick up the story on Charles Keating, we find that the
federal regulators who began to monitor the activities of his
Lincoln Savings & Loan were overmatched. But there was one
hero, Edwin Gray, a mainstream Reaganite who was made
chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. He sounded
the alarm.

In the House, Speaker Jim Wright, and Texas Democrats J.J.
Pickle and Jim Chapman, fought Gray at every turn. In the
Senate he was harangued by the Keating Five (more later).

The public interest group, Common Cause, issued a report on the
period of the investigation into the S&Ls. Gray said there were
two significant problems in trying to handle the issues in the
savings and loan industry.

"On the one hand, the White House during the Reagan
Administration was pursuing a policy of deregulation, and under
this policy refused to support requests for the personnel and funds
required to carry out increased examinations of individual thrifts.
On the other hand, Congress - and especially the House and
Senate Banking Committees - refused to pass the legislation that
was necessary in some cases to more strictly regulate the S&Ls,
and prevent a further deterioration of a worsening situation."

By the end of his term, June 1987, author Harold Evans described
Gray as "like a boxer who had taken too many punches." Gray
was then replaced by M. Danny Wall, to put it mildly, a disaster.
Wall had been a key staff member for Utah Senator Jake Garn.
And under Wall supervision was lax. He promptly suspended the
audit of Keating''s S&L and set out on junkets around the country
telling everyone that 70% of the S&Ls were healthy. As for
Lincoln Savings & Loan, the delay in closing it cost the U.S.
taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

And then there was the Keating Five. From 1984 to 1988,
Charles Keating gave about $2 million to various candidates and
$1.3 million to his special "angels," Senators Alan Cranston (D-
CA), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), Donald Riegle
(D-MI), and Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ).

According to historian Charles Morris, the Keating Five
"intervened repeatedly and heavy-handedly to block regulatory
actions against Keating, and when local regulators revealed that
they planned to file criminal charges (April 1987), the senators
succeeded in transferring regulatory oversight back to the D.C.
Bank Board, allowing Keating to wreak havoc with taxpayers
money for more than another year."

During the first quarter of 1989, Lincoln Savings had lost $29
million and Keating was frantically trying to put together a deal to
sell the bank and avoid a Federal takeover. He wrote a note to
Alan Cranston.

"Some politically important person [Cranston] has got to lay it on
the line to Danny Wall and Jake Garn that they unescapably (sic)
and must decisively approve this deal." Cranston was the
messenger.

Finally, in April of that year, Lincoln was taken over by the
authorities. At a press conference, Charles Keating was asked
about his political contributions.

"One question, among the many raised in recent weeks, has to do
with whether my financial support in any way influenced several
political figures to take up any cause. I want to say in the most
forceful way I can: I certainly hope so."

The Keating Five was investigated for leaning on federal
regulatory officials on behalf of Keating and a number of
investigations began as to whether these senators had acted
improperly and whether Keating had been able to buy influence
through his campaign contributions. These included
investigations by the State of California, the U.S. Department of
Justice, and the Senate Ethics Committee. While the California
and the Justice Department investigations concentrated on
Keating''s action, the Senate Ethics Committee investigation
concentrated on the actions of the five senators implicated.

Although the special counsel to the Ethics Committee advised the
Senate that Senators Glenn and McCain were not substantially
involved, months of testimony revealed that all five senators had
acted improperly in varying degrees. All of them, however, continued
to proclaim that they were not involved in any wrongdoing, and were
just following normal campaign funding practices.

In the end, the Senate Ethics Committee concluded that Cranston,
DeConcini, and Riegle had substantially interfered with the
federal regulators'' enforcement processes at the request of
Charles Keating. In August 1991, the Ethics Committee
recommended to the full Senate the censuring of Cranston for
reprehensible conduct. The other four senators were noted for
questionable conduct. Cranston had already decided not to seek
re-election, citing medical problems. Riegle and DeConcini were
mortally wounded, politically, while McCain and Glenn survived.

Keating, for his part, continued to blame regulators whom he
suggested had a vendetta against him and were out to sabotage
his business. At the time of the collapse, Lincoln assets were $5.8
billion. Home mortgages were now only about 2% of total
assets. Keating claimed that if the government had left him alone
he would have gotten out of his hole.

In the end, President Bush established the Resolution Trust Corp.
to manage and sell the insolvent S&Ls. The RTC was authorized
to issue long-term bonds to take over the insolvent institutions,
pay off the depositors, and sell off the assets. The original clean-
up cost of $50 billion, escalated to $150 billion. Aside from the
cost to taxpayers of $2 billion, alone, for Lincoln, Keating had
bilked about 20,000 individual investors, mostly in California,
who purchased $200 million of junk bonds during the last days of
Lincoln as Keating scrambled to save the bank. Unfortunately,
most of the bonds were sold by unscrupulous Lincoln salespeople
who led many of the investors to believe that the bonds were
federally insured. They weren''t.

In April 1992, Keating was sentenced in California state court to
ten years in prison for duping the bond investors. That July, a
federal jury ordered Keating to pay $3.3 billion in damages as
well as serve an additional 12-years for 73 counts of federal
securities and wire fraud.

Next week, the Keating verdicts take a twist or two. Plus, I''ll
explore the genesis of the war between McCain and the Arizona
Republic, as well as his links to Keating. Yes, his campaign for
the Republican nomination may be over, but when you read some of
the tales of the 1980s, you''ll nod your head as you compare them
to what transpired during this past primary season. And finally,
a figure from the O.J. Simpson trial emerges as well! All of this,
if you keep it where it is.

Sources: Various wire service reports
Common Cause web site
"The American Century," Harold Evans
"Devil Take the Hindmost," Edward Chancellor
"Money, Greed & Risk," Charles Morris

Brian Trumbore



AddThis Feed Button

 

-03/10/2000-      
Web Epoch NJ Web Design  |  (c) Copyright 2016 StocksandNews.com, LLC.

Wall Street History

03/10/2000

Charles Keating, Part II

As we pick up the story on Charles Keating, we find that the
federal regulators who began to monitor the activities of his
Lincoln Savings & Loan were overmatched. But there was one
hero, Edwin Gray, a mainstream Reaganite who was made
chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. He sounded
the alarm.

In the House, Speaker Jim Wright, and Texas Democrats J.J.
Pickle and Jim Chapman, fought Gray at every turn. In the
Senate he was harangued by the Keating Five (more later).

The public interest group, Common Cause, issued a report on the
period of the investigation into the S&Ls. Gray said there were
two significant problems in trying to handle the issues in the
savings and loan industry.

"On the one hand, the White House during the Reagan
Administration was pursuing a policy of deregulation, and under
this policy refused to support requests for the personnel and funds
required to carry out increased examinations of individual thrifts.
On the other hand, Congress - and especially the House and
Senate Banking Committees - refused to pass the legislation that
was necessary in some cases to more strictly regulate the S&Ls,
and prevent a further deterioration of a worsening situation."

By the end of his term, June 1987, author Harold Evans described
Gray as "like a boxer who had taken too many punches." Gray
was then replaced by M. Danny Wall, to put it mildly, a disaster.
Wall had been a key staff member for Utah Senator Jake Garn.
And under Wall supervision was lax. He promptly suspended the
audit of Keating''s S&L and set out on junkets around the country
telling everyone that 70% of the S&Ls were healthy. As for
Lincoln Savings & Loan, the delay in closing it cost the U.S.
taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

And then there was the Keating Five. From 1984 to 1988,
Charles Keating gave about $2 million to various candidates and
$1.3 million to his special "angels," Senators Alan Cranston (D-
CA), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), Donald Riegle
(D-MI), and Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ).

According to historian Charles Morris, the Keating Five
"intervened repeatedly and heavy-handedly to block regulatory
actions against Keating, and when local regulators revealed that
they planned to file criminal charges (April 1987), the senators
succeeded in transferring regulatory oversight back to the D.C.
Bank Board, allowing Keating to wreak havoc with taxpayers
money for more than another year."

During the first quarter of 1989, Lincoln Savings had lost $29
million and Keating was frantically trying to put together a deal to
sell the bank and avoid a Federal takeover. He wrote a note to
Alan Cranston.

"Some politically important person [Cranston] has got to lay it on
the line to Danny Wall and Jake Garn that they unescapably (sic)
and must decisively approve this deal." Cranston was the
messenger.

Finally, in April of that year, Lincoln was taken over by the
authorities. At a press conference, Charles Keating was asked
about his political contributions.

"One question, among the many raised in recent weeks, has to do
with whether my financial support in any way influenced several
political figures to take up any cause. I want to say in the most
forceful way I can: I certainly hope so."

The Keating Five was investigated for leaning on federal
regulatory officials on behalf of Keating and a number of
investigations began as to whether these senators had acted
improperly and whether Keating had been able to buy influence
through his campaign contributions. These included
investigations by the State of California, the U.S. Department of
Justice, and the Senate Ethics Committee. While the California
and the Justice Department investigations concentrated on
Keating''s action, the Senate Ethics Committee investigation
concentrated on the actions of the five senators implicated.

Although the special counsel to the Ethics Committee advised the
Senate that Senators Glenn and McCain were not substantially
involved, months of testimony revealed that all five senators had
acted improperly in varying degrees. All of them, however, continued
to proclaim that they were not involved in any wrongdoing, and were
just following normal campaign funding practices.

In the end, the Senate Ethics Committee concluded that Cranston,
DeConcini, and Riegle had substantially interfered with the
federal regulators'' enforcement processes at the request of
Charles Keating. In August 1991, the Ethics Committee
recommended to the full Senate the censuring of Cranston for
reprehensible conduct. The other four senators were noted for
questionable conduct. Cranston had already decided not to seek
re-election, citing medical problems. Riegle and DeConcini were
mortally wounded, politically, while McCain and Glenn survived.

Keating, for his part, continued to blame regulators whom he
suggested had a vendetta against him and were out to sabotage
his business. At the time of the collapse, Lincoln assets were $5.8
billion. Home mortgages were now only about 2% of total
assets. Keating claimed that if the government had left him alone
he would have gotten out of his hole.

In the end, President Bush established the Resolution Trust Corp.
to manage and sell the insolvent S&Ls. The RTC was authorized
to issue long-term bonds to take over the insolvent institutions,
pay off the depositors, and sell off the assets. The original clean-
up cost of $50 billion, escalated to $150 billion. Aside from the
cost to taxpayers of $2 billion, alone, for Lincoln, Keating had
bilked about 20,000 individual investors, mostly in California,
who purchased $200 million of junk bonds during the last days of
Lincoln as Keating scrambled to save the bank. Unfortunately,
most of the bonds were sold by unscrupulous Lincoln salespeople
who led many of the investors to believe that the bonds were
federally insured. They weren''t.

In April 1992, Keating was sentenced in California state court to
ten years in prison for duping the bond investors. That July, a
federal jury ordered Keating to pay $3.3 billion in damages as
well as serve an additional 12-years for 73 counts of federal
securities and wire fraud.

Next week, the Keating verdicts take a twist or two. Plus, I''ll
explore the genesis of the war between McCain and the Arizona
Republic, as well as his links to Keating. Yes, his campaign for
the Republican nomination may be over, but when you read some of
the tales of the 1980s, you''ll nod your head as you compare them
to what transpired during this past primary season. And finally,
a figure from the O.J. Simpson trial emerges as well! All of this,
if you keep it where it is.

Sources: Various wire service reports
Common Cause web site
"The American Century," Harold Evans
"Devil Take the Hindmost," Edward Chancellor
"Money, Greed & Risk," Charles Morris

Brian Trumbore