Clarity Amidst the Noise

Clarity Amidst the Noise

Noise is everywhere. Last night was a cool night and the

windows were open. Unfortunately, conditions were just right

for transmitting the noise of traffic on freeways some two miles

from our house. I didn”t sleep well as a result. We”ve talked

about noise in earlier columns. That cosmic background

radiation from the Big Bang is responsible for some of the noise

on your TV picture. Lightning and a host of other sources can

cause static or other background noises when listening to a radio

program, particularly on one of the weaker stations. The

problem is to transmit and receive information, in the form of a

TV picture or Metropolitan Opera radio broadcast, without

distortion in the presence of all that noise.

I was recently in the main reception area at Lucent Technologies”

world headquarters, also home of Bell Labs, where I used to

hang my hat. I couldn”t help noticing a bust of Claude Shannon

displayed prominently near the reception desk. Shannon died

last February, having spent the last years of his life in a nursing

home with Alzheimer”s disease. A sad ending for one of the true

intellectual giants of the 20th century. I couldn”t help thinking

how ironic it is that, as Shannon was fading from the scene, so

too was Bell Labs being transformed from a national treasure

into a shell of its former self. I”ve seen a number of articles on

Shannon in the past few years, one of which I received from a

friend just a week or so ago. The article is by M. Mitchell

Waldrop in the MIT Technology Review and is titled “Reluctant

Father of the Digital Age. Claude Shannon”.

Picture the year 1948 at Bell Labs. Just a week before the year

began, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain had invented the “point

contact” transistor. William Shockley, incensed that he, the

leader of the group, was not in on the invention, was to put forth

intense effort on the theory and come up with the idea for the

much more useful “pn junction” transistor. Strangely, he had

already proposed the idea of what was later to become the “field

effect” transistor, which is today served up by the millions in

your computer. The ducks were lined up for Jack Kilby to

invent the integrated circuit some years later to begin the silicon

chip revolution.

In another corner of Bell Labs, Claude Shannon, at age 32, was

about to publish a theoretical paper that would also change the

world and complement perfectly the capabilities of the future

silicon chip. The paper was called “A Mathematical Theory of

Communication” and appeared in the October 1948 issue of the

Bell System Technical Journal. I also published my most widely

read paper in the same Bell System Technical Journal in 1960. I

wonder why it hasn”t received the same acclaim? Perhaps it”s

because my subject, the solubilities of impurities in germanium

and silicon, doesn”t quite stand up to a paper that revealed and

defined the very essence of information itself. Shannon showed

that any kind of information, ranging from music to text to

telephone or radio messages or TV pictures, could be encoded in

binary digits, what we now know as bits. Shannon had fathered

the field that became known as information theory. This paper

alone stands as one of the most influential papers of the 20th

century.

However, a decade earlier, Shannon was no slouch either. His

dissertation for his master”s degree in electrical engineering at

MIT was titled “A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching

Circuits”. Not a title that would indicate that some would call it

the most important master”s thesis of the 20th century. In it,

Shannon said that if a statement is either true or false, you could

also characterize the statement by a 1 or a 0. Maybe not a

revolutionary idea, but he carried it a step further by noting that a

closed or open switch in a relay circuit could be designated as a 1

or a 0. Still not impressed? Shannon took this idea and showed

that a simple relay circuit could be used to carry out a logical

operation.

For example, one simple relay circuit is essentially just a couple

of switches lined up. Suppose you have two switches in the line

leading to your reading lamp. If a switch is closed it”s a 1, if

open it”s a 0. If switch # 1 is closed AND switch #2 is closed,

that”s a 11, current flows and the lamp lights. If either switch is

open, 10 or 01, or if both switches are open, 00, your lamp won”t

light. You”ve just performed a logical operation, the AND

operation with your simple circuit. If something is true (switch

closed) AND something else is true (other switch closed) THEN

something happens (current flows). You could also wire up your

two switches so that if something is true (switch is closed) OR

something else is true (other switch is closed) THEN something

happens (current flows). You”ve now performed the logic OR

operation with an electrical circuit.

Still not impressed? Remember, this was back in 1937-1938

when calculators that could add, subtract, multiply and divide

were large instruments about the size of typewriters. These

calculators contained an assembly of wheels and gears and made

an impressive amount of noise doing simple calculations. They

were definitely not digital! I was still using them in graduate

school in 1950. Shannon, in his early 20s, had anticipated that

computers could be programmed through such AND and OR

logic operations to “decide” what to do next based on the input

given them. Today, your computer is chockfull of 1s and 0s in

the form of open and closed switches in circuits carrying out all

sorts of logic operations even as you look at this on your

monitor. That was one helluva master”s thesis!

What about noise? Back to 1948, Shannon”s digital encoding of

information was astounding. But what really caught the attention

of many was something equally breathtaking. He also showed

that once information was encoded digitally, it could be

transmitted without error, even in the presence of noise. If there”s

a lot of static or other noise, you have to encode the information

in more digits or bits than if there were no noise. Shannon also

showed that with large amounts of noise, you need error-

correcting codes built into the system.

Younger readers probably won”t know how gingerly we had to

handle and clean those fantastic long-playing vinyl records in

those ancient times when high fi was coming into being. Now,

you can have noise in the form of fingerprints and maybe even

minor scratches on your CDs and the music sounds perfect,

thanks to Shannon and the error-correcting codes he inspired.

These CDs are loaded with 1s and 0s in the form of tiny pits or

no pits that are massaged to give you the perfect sound. (Your

speaker may not be up to reproducing what is fed to it, however.)

The MIT article compared Shannon to Einstein in having the rare

ability to look at a complex problem in a completely different

way than us ordinary mortals. One of Einstein”s achievements

was to show that an object can”t go faster than the speed of light.

Shannon also came up with a speed limit in terms of how fast

you can send information error-free. If you try to send

information any faster, don”t expect perfection at the other end!

You might have thought that the immediate public appreciation

of the magnitude of Shannon”s achievement in his 1948 paper

would have resulted in his enjoyment of his newfound celebrity.

On the contrary, he hated it and kept out of the public eye as

much as possible. In fact, he was quite upset that his ideas were

being greatly oversold. At least that”s what he thought. The

world was awash in articles dealing with ”information theory”. In

a 1956 paper, Shannon wrote that information theory had

“perhaps ballooned to an importance beyond its actual

accomplishments”.

Perhaps Shannon”s shunning of the limelight explains something.

I decided to look up what was said about him in the hefty

volumes of “A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell

System”. I found only a few lines devoted to him in one volume

published in 1978. Shannon”s 1948 paper was only mentioned

in passing. I used to ride the bus to Bell Labs with Mort Fagen,

editor of that volume. Were he alive today, I would chide him

for giving such short shrift to one of Bell Labs” most illustrious

figures!

MIT hired Shannon away from Bell Labs in 1958. I had been at

Bell Labs for six years by then but never saw him riding his

unicycle down the halls late at night. I do recall later seeing his

famous “Ultimate Machine” on TV, possibly on the Johnny

Carson show. This machine is a box with a switch on the side.

When the switch is thrown the lid of the box opens and a hand

appears. The hand then reaches over the side of the box, turns

off the switch and retreats back into the box as the lid slowly

closes! Shannon loved to make silly things like that.

Incidentally, as I was in the midst of writing this column, Brian

Trumbore brought over an article from the New York Times

about the death of Sir Fred Hoyle this past week. Hoyle, an

outstanding astronomer, was the one who coined the term ”big

bang”, about which we”ve said so much in this column. Ironically,

he meant the term to be derisive and didn”t believe the Big Bang

theory. In fact, in 1948, Hoyle published his own theory that the

universe did not have a beginning but was in a steady state. Stars

and galaxies had beginnings, but not the universe. His view,

held to his death, is not shared by many in light of all the

evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.

On the other hand, those CDs of Beethoven”s Fifth or Madonna

demonstrate every time you play them that information can be

encoded in digits and transmitted faithfully. Claude Shannon

told us that in 1948. Today, 53 years later, digital radio and

digital TV are just emerging to embed his legacy even deeper

into modern life.

Allen F. Bortrum