The Erie Canal, Part II

The Erie Canal, Part II

So on July 4, 1817, construction began on the Erie Canal, the

artificial waterway that connected Buffalo on Lake Erie to

Albany on the Hudson River. It was the first such conveyance in

the U.S. and led to the spectacular growth of New York City, as

well as turning New York into the financial capital of the world.

The “Big Ditch,” as it was affectionately called, stretched 363

miles, descending 555 feet from Lake Erie to the Hudson through

83 locks. It was 40” wide.4” deep.and entirely dug by hand.

And, if you are of Irish extraction, you can be proud that some

3,000 Irish immigrants worked on the canal; primarily because

attempts at farming in upstate New York had failed, thus the

project provided much-needed employment in the region.

On October 22, 1819, the first boat to travel on the canal went

from Rome to Utica. By 1821, some 220 of the 363 miles were

in operation, but construction of the hardest parts had not yet

begun (the area closest to the Hudson). Governor De Witt

Clinton nearly lost the governorship in 1821 as opposition from

”downstate” residents nearly outweighed those who were smart

enough to know a good thing when they saw it.

And in 1825, true to Clinton”s word, the canal was completed,

well within the ten-year goal he had set back in 1817. Plus, it

came in on budget, $7 million.

On October 26, the governor set out from Buffalo in what would

be a two-week party. And then on November 7, Clinton

performed the “wedding of the waters” ceremony out near Sandy

Hook, NJ, as he mingled Lake Erie water into the Atlantic. New

York would henceforth become “the emporium of commerce, the

seat of manufactures, [and] the focus of great moneyed

operations.”

In 1825, some 13,100 boats passed between Buffalo and Albany,

paying $500,000 in tolls which was more than enough to fund

the debt the state had incurred.

And, just as the Internet has helped to lower prices in some

processes today, the Erie Canal was a huge boon to the region”s

consumers. The canal was the most important freight route from

the East to the Mid West. Agricultural production from beyond

the Appalachians now passed through a far shorter route than had

been the norm. Historian John Steele Gordon notes that before

the canal was built, “a ton of flour in Buffalo, worth $40, could

be transported overland to New York City in 3 weeks at a cost of

$120. Using the canal it could be shipped in 8 days at a cost of

$6.”

Gordon also notes that as a result of the canal, the growth of New

York City exploded. In 1820, New York had approximately

125,000 residents, while Philadelphia was at 110,000. By

1860, New York registered almost 1.1 million; Philadelphia, half

that number. And, in another example of the impact, back in

1800, 9% of the country”s foreign commerce had passed through

New York. By 1860 that figure was 62%.

[As a result of the Erie Canal, Philadelphia was shocked to

discover that the cheapest route for freight traffic to Pittsburgh

was by way of New York City, Albany, Buffalo, and wagon road

from Lake Erie. By 1840, Pennsylvania had 1,000 miles of

canals in operation. It was too late.]

Because the canal drew eastward much of the trade that once

went down to the Gulf, it had not only major economic

consequences, but also political ones as well. The Erie Canal

tied together East and West while isolating the South.

Canal mania gripped the northern half of the country as the Big

Ditch was being completed. In New York, branches of the Erie

Canal soon put most of the state within reach of it. And by 1828,

branches of the Delaware and Hudson canal linked New York

with the coalfields of northeastern Pennsylvania.

By 1837 some 3,000 miles of waterways were crisscrossing

America. Europeans were eager to invest in canal shares, which

were seen to be the perfect way to participate in the nation”s fast-

growing economy.

But the canal construction and investment boom was bound to

end badly. More than one state had borrowed heavily to finance

the projects, only to see them go bust. Bondholders had no

recourse. Some of the ventures were simply frauds. One

offering, the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, designed to

be a southerly version of EC, was never completed after running

up costs of $22 million, over three times the Erie”s $7 million

price tag.

And there was a new threat on the horizon.the railroad. [Back

in 1825, the first commercial steam railway had begun operations

in England.] Coupled with the Panic of 1837 and the ensuing

depression, it spelled doom.

On the other hand, the Erie Canal can forever be credited with

solidifying New York”s preeminent position on the world scene.

Oliver Wendell Holmes (the author, not the Chief Justice), best

summed it up.

“Only with the planning and financing of the Erie Canal did Wall

Street threaten the older centers. When the Big Ditch proved

even more beneficial than expected, all of New York State and

the old Northwest opened to the port. As the city grew, so Wall

Street expanded its credit and banking operations. The brokers

waxed strong, as New York became the tip of the tongue that

laps up the cream of the continent.”

[Sources: Same as Part I, 8/4]

Brian Trumbore