The Death of a President

The Death of a President

We are approaching the 100th anniversary of a rather significant

event in American history, the assassination of William

McKinley, the 25th president of the United States. The reason

why I”m writing about it in this space is because I was curious as

to the market reaction back then. Yes, there was lots of activity

on Wall Street in those days. The economy was humming and

folks like J.P. Morgan were in the midst of creating their

business empires.

As for McKinley, he was a true transition figure. Elected for his

first term in 1896, McKinley was the last Civil War veteran to

become president. He had already had a long political career,

serving in Congress for 24 years as well as being governor of his

home state of Ohio. He then led America through the Spanish-

American War (1898-99), which planted the flag halfway around

the world, thus shedding the nation”s isolationist past. And in

1899 he became the first president to ride in an automobile when

he took a ride in a Stanley Steamer. It was an age of invention,

progress and prosperity. The historian Don Young writes of his

presidency:

“At home, he had aided the growth of big business and industry,

which were already obliterating the world in which he had grown

up. Abroad, he helped to thrust America onto the world stage

and set a course that would lead to great events in the next

century. McKinley was a wise, thoughtful man. He remains a

divided figure, both the last president of the nineteenth century

and, barely, the first president of the twentieth.”

McKinley had been re-elected in 1900, once again defeating William

Jennings Bryan. Teddy Roosevelt was his vice president (Garrett

Hobart was the VP during McKinley”s first term). On September 5,

1901, McKinley was up in Buffalo, NY at a trade show where he gave

a presentation, proclaiming, that isolationism was “no longer

possible or desirable,” as well as repeating his pro-business

sentiments. The following day, September 6, he went out into the

crowd to shake hands with the exhibition attendees when an

anarchist, Leon Czolgosz, concealing a pistol under a handkerchief,

shot the President twice (in the chest and abdomen). McKinley,

upon being shot in this vast throng of humanity, walked steadily

to a chair and reassured his aides, “I am not badly hurt, I assure

you.” He was then removed in an ambulance.

It was about 4:00 PM on a Friday and the financial markets had

been closed for the day. Bulletins immediately flew across the

country. But by 10:00 PM that evening, McKinley”s physicians

released the first medical report, saying “no serious symptoms

have developed (following surgery). He is resting well.his

condition at present justifies hope of recovery.”

The next morning, headlines in the September 7 edition of the

New York Times read: “Confidence in Financial Circles.No

Occasion For Excitement. (sub-headline) They Point Out that

Whatever the Outcome of the Buffalo Tragedy, the Nation”s

Prosperity and Stability Will Be Unaffected.”

The main Times report dealing with the financial implications

began thusly:

“In Wall Street, as to security market values – the one question,

the one test involved in consideration of the tragedy at Buffalo, is

as to whether common sense shall rule..

“Much was heard of what Wall Street experienced twenty years

ago (at the time of President Garfield”s assassination).Shown

with notable clearness was the fact that they whose interests are

largest, they who are most in touch with what in the financial

world is biggest, were least of all exercised, least of all

pessimistic.

“Of course the speculating ”bear” was present, and he was very

woeful. An immediate panic, the tottering of everything to ruin,

was among his milder prophecies. Here was evidence of anarchy

rampant, he insisted, and European investors must forthwith

abhor us. Much he had to say also of uncertainty in national

policies, Roosevelt succeeding McKinley.

“Scant grace was, however, commanded by sorry talk like this.

For the most part the manner of mind that Wall Street men were

in was of the utmost confidence in the lasting quality and

influence of American prosperity, lamenting, earnestly though

every confident man did, this third Presidential assassination

atrocity.”

James J. Keene, one of the two or three Wall Street leaders of

that day remarked:

“Sane men will not for an instant forget that it is the country”s

leader, not the country itself, that is sacrificed.

“Even if the most woeful of results, the President”s death, should

follow, we have left to us still those extraordinary conditions of

prosperity for which he has stood, and concerning which he has

to the very last testified eloquently.”

J.P. Morgan was still in his offices when word broke late that

afternoon. Morgan was stunned, telling aides (with reporters

present), “This is, indeed, very, very sad news. It is impossible

to say anything as to the effect upon the market and upon

conditions in general.”

Most other comments made that fateful day were of the

optimistic variety. R.H. Thomas, Governor of the New York

Stock Exchange said, “(If McKinley should die), such a

misfortune does not signify a National calamity in the sense of

the word that the Nation itself must suffer. Instead, the Nation

will go on as ever, because it is greater than the individual. The

country is wonderfully prosperous.I think that there should be

no fear of any bad break in the stock market, which but

represents in one form this great prosperity. The people will

stand by their guns, and you will find that the market will be

well-protected.”

All of the common merchants on the streets of New York echoed

similar thoughts, the prosperity was too entrenched to be

impacted by McKinley”s possible death.

But dining at Delmonico”s that evening (for those of you not

from the New York area, this establishment remains a New York

institution to this day), Charles Schwab (the grandfather of the

current Charles Schwab, and then president of U.S. Steel), said,

“Should the President die, it would certainly have a most

depressing effect upon business and industry. The effect would

be but temporary, however, for business is in such shape now

and businessmen are in such a position that even the death of the

President could cause only a temporary calamity.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average had closed trading on

September 6 at 72.27. Despite the reassurances from the

business community, and the seemingly calm words from the

President”s doctors, however, the Dow fell 4.5% on the 7th (the

markets traded a half-day on Saturday”s back then) to 69.03.

But when the Street opened back up for trading on Monday

September 9, the nation was convinced the President would

make it. The Dow finished at 70.69 and rose to 71.45 on the

10th. On Friday, September 13, though, news began to leak that

McKinley was seriously ill again. What the doctors really didn”t

know after the initial surgery was that gangrene set in along the

line of the bullets path. By the evening of the 13th death was

certain. So Wall Street took it on the chin that day, losing

4.3% to the 67.25 level.

President McKinley died at 2:15 AM on the 14th. His last words

to his wife were, “Nearer, my God to Thee, Nearer to Thee.”

The financial markets were then closed on Saturday, September

14. When they reopened on Monday, the Dow staged another

snapback rally to 70.01 (+4.1%). But by September 25 the index

was back to 66.22. The business community was not initially

enamored with the “liberal” thinking of Teddy Roosevelt. In

fact, the Republicans had made him vice president because they

didn”t want to have to deal with him as an “outside” force in the

party. At age 43, Roosevelt thus became the youngest president

in our nation”s history. As you know, things worked out pretty

well for him, despite the naysayers.

*One note concerning the Dow Jones. The industrial average

was first introduced on May 26, 1896. The then 12 stock

average reached its lowest point in history on August 8 of that

year, 28.48. After the Crash of 1929 however, the Dow fell to an

eventual low of 41.22 on July 8, 1932. In essence, from 1896 to

1932 the average rose from 28 to 41.that”s it.

Sources:

“American Heritage: The Presidents,” Michael Beschloss and

Don Young

“The Encyclopedia of American Facts and Dates,” Gorton

Carruth

“The Dow Jones Averages,” Phyllis Pierce

Brian Trumbore