The Event Horizon – Gate to Hell

The Event Horizon – Gate to Hell

Brian Trumbore tells me you all are dying for the word on black

holes. I have to admit right up front that I personally have never

even seen a black hole. The closest I”ve come is the vacuum-

flush toilet found on the Maasdam on our recent Baltic cruise.

You can”t see how the toilet works because you have to lower the

lid to push the flush button and you are strongly advised never to

push that button while seated on the device. Obviously, the fear

is that you”ll be sucked in, never to be seen again. That seat is an

event horizon.

To those who hesitate to ask about black holes, let me quote from

the late Carl Sagan”s introduction to Stephen Hawking”s book “A

Brief History of Time”. “We go through our daily lives

understanding almost nothing of the world. …Except for children

(who don”t know enough not to ask the important questions), few

of us spend much time wondering why nature is the way it is.

…There are even children, and I have met some of them, who

want to know what a black hole looks like….” (Would you

believe that our 11-year old granddaughter asked that very

question recently?) In his introduction, Sagan tells of attending a

meeting in England sponsored by the Royal Society of London.

The meeting dealt with how to search for extraterrestrial life,

another pretty deep question! During a coffee break, Sagan

wandered into a larger meeting in another room, where he saw a

man in a wheelchair slowly signing his name in a book that, on

an earlier page, contained the signature of Isaac Newton. The

occasion was the induction of new fellows into the Royal

Society. The wheelchair-bound Hawking received an ovation

then and, 25 years later, is still active, even hosting a TV science

series, though reduced by Lou Gehrig”s disease to speaking via a

computer. Hawking”s chair at Cambridge was once occupied by

Newton, of the famed falling apple and the “father” of the laws

of gravity. It is only fitting that Hawking”s sophisticated

theoretical work has dealt with gravity in its most concentrated

form. What follows is derived from Hawking”s 1987 book and

other more recent sources. One source is an article in the May

issue of Scientific American by a fellow named Jean-Pierre

Lasota, whose father had known Einstein personally.

The term “black hole” was coined in 1969 by John Wheeler, but

the concept dates at least back to John Mitchell at Cambridge, of

course. He wrote a paper in 1783 suggesting that if a star were

sufficiently massive, light could not escape its gravitation and

that nobody would ever see the star. The idea went out of favor

during the 19th century and, of course, it remained for the usual

culprit, Einstein, to explain in 1915 how gravity affects light in

his general theory of relativity. We discussed earlier how light is

bent by gravity.

To see how a black hole is formed, let”s consider the life and

death of three stars, a little one, a big one and a really big one.

Stars are formed when gas, mostly hydrogen, accumulates and as

it does, its gravity pulls in more and more gas. As the gas

condenses, the hydrogen atoms bang into each other more and

more and faster and faster. This heats up the gas until it becomes

so hot that the hydrogen atoms don”t bounce off each other but

fuse together to form helium, as in the hydrogen bomb. We

know that the bomb and the sun, a mediocre star, give off lots of

heat when this hydrogen “fusion” occurs. The heat increases the

pressure of the gas. (I remember being horrified when, on a Cub

Scout overnight, the bonfire was started and someone decided to

heat a can of baked beans without opening the can! A near-

catastrophic example of heat increasing the pressure.) Well, the

increased pressure in a star builds up until it just balances the

contraction of the gas due to gravity. The star then becomes

stable in the sense that it just keeps burning up hydrogen to form

helium and, like our sun, can perk away for billions of years

Eventually, the hydrogen is pretty well exhausted. The star

cools, the pressure goes down and the star starts to contract again

after all those years. Now things get interesting. Back in 1928,

an Indian fellow named Chandrasekhar was sailing from India to

England to work with the famous astronomer Sir Arthur

Eddington, who had a wry sense of humor. When someone

suggested to him that only three people in the world understood

Einstein”s relativity theory, Eddington reportedly replied, “I”m

trying to think who the third person is.” Well, on the ship,

Chandrasekhar worked out how big a star had to be to support

itself against its own gravity. He came to the conclusion that the

star could be only about 50 percent bigger than our sun. For a

star about the size of our sun, the star would collapse to roughly

a few thousand miles in diameter. Such “white dwarfs” were

indeed observed. These white dwarfs would still have electrons,

protons and neutrons, although at huge densities compared to

matter on earth. A Russian, Lev Landau, at about the same time

proposed that stars 1 to 2 times the size of our sun could have

another fate. They would collapse so far that all the electrons

would react with the protons to form neutrons, thus forming

“neutron” stars only 10 miles or so in diameter. Neutron stars

have also been detected. In the white dwarfs a shot glass of

dwarf can weigh hundreds of tons, while a cubic inch of a

neutron star can weigh hundreds of millions of tons! Now that”s

real density!

But Chandrasekhar”s work had another more startling

implication. What if the original star was more than 1-1/2 to 2

times the size of our sun? Would it keep collapsing to

infinite density, i.e., to a point? Eddington, and even Einstein,

thought this impossible and Eddington was so violently opposed

to the idea that Chandrasekhar was persuaded to abandon this

work. In 1939, however, J. Robert Oppenheimer solved

Einstein”s relativity theory for such a really big star and found

that its gravity would bend the light rays back so strongly that

light indeed could not escape and the star would be invisible.

Since Einstein had shown that nothing could move faster than the

speed of light, it followed that nothing else could escape from the

condensed star. Unfortunately, World War II and the little

matter of leading the scientific development of the atomic bomb

distracted Oppenheimer. His work was rediscovered in the

1960s, when the “black hole” became a respectable concept for

speculation and people like Hawking and Penrose showed that in

the black hole there had to be a “singularity” of infinite density

(that sucker is really, really dense!). This is sort of like the big

bang in reverse, which created the universe from such a

“singularity”.

With the acceptance of the idea of a black hole, there arose a new

term, the “event horizon”. Hawking likens the event horizon to

Dante”s entrance to Hell – “All hope abandon, ye who enter here.”

The event horizon is like a one-way skin, or membrane

surrounding the black hole that lets anything in but nothing out.

Let”s imagine what it would be like for Sylvester, an astronaut

who got curious and decided to investigate a black hole up close

and personal. Let”s assume that he was somewhat of a Superman

type and decided to do a space walk while Cynthia, his fellow

astronaut, stayed behind in the space shuttle. Remember that

they can”t see the black hole, but may suspect something unusual.

As Sylvester comes near the event horizon, he sees nothing

unusual, although looking back to the shuttle, he may notice

things rather distorted due to distortion of the light rays. At any

rate, he”s humming “Fly Me to the Moon” as he blissfully passes

through the event horizon. He looks back at the shuttle and it”s

still there. Cynthia, however, can no longer see Sylvester, whose

future is sealed. He begins to feel the pull of gravity and feels

elongated and within seconds is torn to shreds as he is sucked

into the “singularity”. All the rocket power in the world cannot

help him escape since he would have to go faster than the speed

of light and Einstein has decreed that”s impossible! For

Sylvester, it”s the end of time in the region of infinite density.

Just as time began with the Big Bang from a singularity, so it

ends for Sylvester. Meanwhile, back in the shuttle, Cynthia is

totally unaware of Sylvester”s fate. She saw him perfectly well

up to just before the event horizon and then he just vanished.

Having bid a fond farewell to Sylvester, let”s consider how big a

black hole can be. Since we can”t know anything about what”s

inside the event horizon, we have to define the size of the hole as

the diameter of the event horizon. It turns out that the diameter

is determined by the mass of the black hole. For example, the

Hubble Space Telescope has detected in the center of one galaxy

a black hole (more conservative scientists call it a black hole

“candidate”) which weighs more than a billion suns and has a

diameter about the size of our solar system. On the other hand a

black hole weighing a mere 10 suns would have a diameter of

less than 50 miles.

How do we know that black holes really exist? One way is to

measure how fast the material around a black hole candidate is

spinning. Two examples, including the one above, are cited on a

website that I believe to be a Cambridge University website:

[ http://www.amtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/bh-obsv.html ]

In the galaxies cited, the speed and size of the rotating discs are

used to calculate the weights of the object that has to be there to

hold the material in orbit. It turns out in both cases the objects

are more than a billion times the weight of our sun and are

roughly the size of our solar system. There is now evidence that

our own Milky Way galaxy contains a black hole in the center.

Another, very informative detailed exposition on black holes can

be found on what I assume is a University of California at

Berkeley website: [ http://cfpa.berkeley.edu/Bhfaq.html#q2 ]

Do we have to worry about being sucked into a black hole? The

answer is no, as long as we stay outside the event horizon, or at

least far enough out. A black hole weighing one sun would not

suck us in any more than our own sun. If our sun became a black

hole, the planets would continue to orbit as before. Of course,

before we all froze to death without the sunlight we”d be mighty

puzzled that the sun just plain vanished without a trace.

To sum up, don”t worry about black holes but if perchance you

should be in the vicinity of an event horizon get out of there as

fast as possible! Incidentally, if you”re feeling sorry for poor

Chandrasekhar not getting credit for his great ideas, he did

manage to pick up a Nobel Prize in 1983, 55 years after his

journey from India to England.

Allen F. Bortrum