Terrifically Tiny Tubular Tweezers

Terrifically Tiny Tubular Tweezers

Today”s subject is nanotubes. We”ve used the term nanothis or

nanothat a few times in previous columns but it occurs to me that

the term “nano” may need further consideration for those

unfamiliar with its meaning. When we talk about lengths or

distances, the term nano just means one-billionth of whatever unit

of length we”re using. A nanomile would be a billionth of a mile

or, if my math is correct, about 6 hundred thousandths of an inch,

pretty small. I suspect you might not be able to see anything that

small with your naked eye. At any rate, this demonstrates that a

billionth of something is a very small fraction of that something.

In the world of atomic dimensions today”s commonly used unit of

measurement is the nanometer, about the same as a nanoyard. (A

meter is 39.37 inches, about 3 inches longer than a yard.) A

billionth of a meter turns out to be about the length that you”d

have if you lined up a half dozen to a dozen carbon atoms in row.

When people talk about nanotechnology or nanoparticles, they”re

generally talking about things that are in the range of hundreds of

nanometers down to one nanometer or less in size.

A few weeks ago, we talked about the radically new forms of

carbon known as fullerenes or buckyballs. We discussed the fact

that these new compounds had a structure precisely like that of a

soccer ball or a geodesic domed building. While the buckyball

materials are of great interest, there is a lot of attention now being

paid to an offspring of the buckyball called the carbon nanotube.

You may recall that the buckyball material was first isolated in

1990. Shortly thereafter, the existence of a nanotube was first

predicted theoretically by workers at the Naval Research

Laboratory (NRL). If you look at a soccer ball or geodesic

dome, you”ll note that the structure involves a mixture of

hexagons and pentagons. The NRL theorists predicted that the

mixing of such 5- and 6-sided shapes could also yield a tubular

structure and that the tubes would have electronic properties

more like metals than graphite, the common form of carbon.

Strangely, their paper was rejected for publication as being too

speculative. Sure enough, it was soon found in Japan that,

nestled among the buckyballs in sooty deposits produced in arc

discharges, were tiny little tubes of carbon closed at both ends by

pentagons. Sumio Iijima published this work in Nature in 1991.

Belatedly, the NRL paper predicting the existence of the tubes

was then accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters and

not published until 1992! I”ve tended to be a little flippant about

theorists in some of these columns but this time they certainly

deserve plaudits for their accurate prediction. I”m glad I wasn”t

the reviewer who originally rejected the paper.

Iijima”s first nanotubes turned out to be what are now known as

multi-walled nanotubes, or MWNTs for short. The MWNTs, I”ve

seen pictured are about 50 nanometers wide. My impression is

that these MWNTs are something like those Russian dolls in

which smaller dolls are stacked inside the larger dolls, etc. In this

case, the dolls are tubes of various sizes. Each tube is like a sheet

of graphite folded into a cylinder. The graphite layers are

composed of hexagons, as we”ve mentioned before. I”ve been

staring at a model of a nanotube and the walls are all hexagons

but as near as I can tell, at the rounded bottom or top of the tube

there is one pentagon that closes the tube. If you”d like to stare at

nanotubes, log on to the Rice University Web site

http://rice.edu/images/allotropes.jpg for pictures and models of all

kinds of interesting carbons.

In 1993, the same Mr. Iijima and a group of workers at IBM in

California independently carried out arc discharges to which they

added various metals. What both groups observed were bundles

or “ropes” of really thin nanotubes only one nanometer or so in

diameter. Now we”re down to atomic scales and these are called

single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs). There is another, very

important “financial” characteristic of the SWNTs. They aren”t as

difficult as the MWNTs or the buckyballs to prepare in significant

quantities, i.e., they”re much less expensive. Furthermore, it

seems that the SWNTs have been made up to a millimeter long,

an astounding length to width ratio. In fact, one French group

claims that in one gram of material they”ve gotten the equivalent

of over a hundred thousand miles of nanotubes.

All this is great from the standpoint of fundamental research but

you might well say “So what?” It turns out that some of the

properties of these new forms of carbon are quite intriguing.

These nanotubes (and the other fullerenes) are extremely strong

and stable forms of carbon. At the same time, the nanotubes can

be bent quite sharply without breaking. They are also very good

electrical conductors but at the same time twisting or bending can

turn them from metals into semiconductors. Within the past year,

a number of reports have appeared showing that the SWNTs can

store large quantities of hydrogen. This opens up the possibility

of using them in fuel cells or batteries. There is even a

demonstration of their use in display applications such as a flat

panel TV set.

And what about the recent report in the December 10, 1999 issue

of Science on nanotweezers made with nanotubes? Philip Kim

and Charles Lieber, a Harvard chemistry professor, developed

these nanotweezers. It”s hard to say whether or not these

tweezers will have practical applications but they certainly have

quite definite applications in studying the properties of materials

and devices down in the range of a ten thousandth of an inch or

so. The tweezers themselves are a neat trick, building on an

effect demonstrated by others in 1992. Two nanotubes are

attached to two electrodes deposited on opposite sides of a

micropipette. By varying the voltage across the two electrodes

the nanotubes will bend toward each other, the amount depending

on the voltage. When the voltage is removed at 8.5 volts, the

tweezers stay closed. By applying the same polarity voltage to

both arms the tweezers will open. Pictures in the Science article

show the tweezers picking up tiny polystyrene balls of less than a

micron (about 1/20,000th of an inch) in diameter.

The tweezers not only can pick up and move tiny objects but also,

because the nanotubes are electrically conducting, allow

measurements to be made on the electrical properties of small

objects. As noted in a previous column, when things get really

small the ordinary electrical properties of the transistors on your

good old silicon chip can change completely. You now

frequently see articles that say that Moore”s Law is in jeopardy

and the great ride we”ve had in increased computing power at

lower prices will be over in ten years or so. Maybe these

tweezers can help out in elucidating what goes on in truly

nanodevices. Another severe problem in making transistors

smaller and smaller is that the connections (wires) have to be

smaller also. Miniaturizing the connections is no simple problem.

Could the nanotubes, being good conductors be used as wires? I

have no idea!

If you have a laptop or notebook computer, you”re familiar with

liquid crystal displays (LCDs). You will know that although the

image quality can be quite good, the LCD can”t compare with the

ordinary cathode ray tube (CRT) on your typical TV or desktop

monitor. The CRT uses a single electron gun at the small end of

your monitor to shoot a beam of electrons across the phosphor-

coated screen, lighting up the various color phosphor dots. An

alternative is something called “field emission” in which there are

thousands of tiny pointy sources of electrons mounted directly in

back of the phosphor dots in a flat screen. The problem with this

field emission process has been to find a material that can be

formed into these points and still stand up to the high currents of

electrons. Since the carbon nanotubes are good conductors and

are quite sturdy materials, they are good candidates if they can be

formed in the precise patterns necessary for a practical TV

display. Now, workers at Samsung in Korea have done just that

and have demonstrated a four and one half-inch nanotube-based

flat screen display. Meanwhile, LCD prices continue to fall and

the LCD technology is getting better. Regardless of which

technology wins out, we”ll all be winners if we can replace those

bulky TV sets with an affordable alternative.

Meanwhile, other workers at IBM have used ultrasonic bubbles to

make the carbon nanotubes curl up into circles several hundred

nanometers in diameter. Apparently, the nanotubes don”t like

water and prefer to attach to a bubble to minimize their contact

with water. Then, as the bubble collapses the end of the

nanotubes follows along until it forms a circle. At this point, the

ends attract each other and the circle, actually a coil, is rather

stable. These circular nanotubes also appear to have interesting

electrical properties.

As you can see, there”s an awful lot going on in nanostuff and

we”ll no doubt have more to say about these titillating tiny tubes

in a future column.

Allen F. Bortrum