Hedy Lamarr, Ecstasy and Frequency Hopping

Hedy Lamarr, Ecstasy and Frequency Hopping

At year”s end, I watch Charles Osgood”s “Sunday Morning” and

its annual celebration of the lives of some of those who died

during the past year. Two of my all time favorites, Victor Borge,

and Jason Robards, were among those on the list. I”ve had the

good fortune to see both of them perform in person. I had met

two others whose passing was noted. One was Milt Hinton, the

personable bass player, who played in a jazz program at our local

art center, where I also met the sculptor George Segal. His

plastering of real people resulted in works ranging from a

passenger sitting in a bus terminal to the Franklin D. Roosevelt

monument in Washington. I had not met one of the departed,

whose legacy is today in use all over the world.

Yet, Charles Osgood made only the briefest mention of Hedwig

Eva Maria Kiesler, who passed away last January. Actually, he

referred to her as Hedy Lamarr, thought by many to be the most

beautiful woman in Hollywood, some even said the world, in my

younger days. (I was shocked to find that the young lady who

does some housework for us had never heard of Hedy. When I

showed her a picture of Hedy she said, “She”s gorgeous!”) Hedy

was born in 1914 in Vienna and, after acting school in Berlin,

made quite a splash in 1933, swimming and gamboling about in

the altogether in the European movie “Ecstasy”. This was many

decades before nudity became a staple in American films. A

rather heavily edited version of the film was shown in the U.S.

and Louis B. Mayer brought her to Hollywood and MGM in

1937. It was Mayer who gave her the name Hedy Lamarr.

Why, in a column nominally devoted to science and technology,

am I dwelling on the death of a movie star? This gal had more

than a beautiful face and figure. She had a brain and also six

husbands. These two factors are not unrelated. Her first husband

was a fellow named Fritz Mandl. It was probably no coincidence

that they were married in 1933, the year of the Ecstasy film. Fritz

was into shells and grenades and in the 1930s manufactured

military airplanes. He also did some research on control

systems. Well, the beauteous Mrs. Mandl, our Hedy, was quite a

hit in Viennese society and charmed all kinds of important folks,

such as Hitler and Mussolini. However, she apparently wasn”t at

all happy with Mandl”s selling of munitions to the Nazis and left

him (escaped might be a better term) to go to London, where she

met Mayer and thence to Hollywood.

Let”s leave Hedy for the moment to consider another man in her

life. George Antheil was born in Trenton, New Jersey in 1900.

His parents were from East Prussia and he also spent time in

Berlin, intending to be a concert pianist. However, after settling

in Paris, he became a leading avant-garde composer. The best

known example of his rather odd musical creations was his

“Ballet Mecanique”. Although he intended this piece to be

performed utilizing 16 player pianos, xylophones and percussion,

the work debuted with a single player piano, electric bells, a siren

and airplane propellers! Not your everyday piece of music! In

1933, the year of the Ecstasy movie, George returned to the

United States to write for Esquire magazine, where his endeavors

included an advice-to-the-lovelorn column. He must have been

an early Ann Landers. In 1939, he wrote a prophetic article in

which he predicted Germany”s invasion of Poland, its attack on

Russia and the entry of the United States into the war. An

eclectic sort, he also wrote articles and even a book dealing with

glandular endocrinology.

It was in 1940 that George and Hedy crossed paths as neighbors

in Hollywood. Hedy, learning of his glandular interests, had a

question for Antheil related to glands that she thought he could

perhaps handle. Again, being somewhat ahead of the times, she

wanted George”s advice on breast enlargement! It was only

natural that the topic of conversation would turn from breasts to

weapons. (I have no idea whether (a) Antheil had any response

to Lamarr”s original question or (b) not having seen Ecstasy,

whether Hedy really would have benefited significantly from

glandular enhancement.)

The weapon that Hedy and George discussed was a radio-

controlled torpedo, not a subject you would expect to be

broached by a reigning sex symbol. However, Hedy must have

paid attention to first husband Fritz”s weapons work and his work

on control systems. Actually, the idea for a radio-controlled

torpedo was not new, but Hedy”s contribution was. She proposed

the concept known as “frequency hopping”. When you change

your radio station or TV channel, you are actually frequency

hopping. I can illustrate Hedy”s contribution with my cordless

phone. Suppose I”m discussing a delicate financial matter with

my broker and fear that someone could be eavesdropping on the

conversation. I have a channel button on my handset and can

switch from the channel, or frequency, that I”m using to any one

of nine other channels. Any eavesdropper will have to switch

immediately to the new frequency to continue listening to my

conversation. His chances of hitting the right channel are only

one in nine. If I keep changing channels randomly, his chances

of getting a coherent eavesdrop of my conversation are pretty

small. I have used frequency hopping to make my conversation

more secure.

Hedy”s idea was to keep an enemy from intercepting and perhaps

changing the instructions to the torpedo by using frequency

hopping to transmit the instructions. This was a great idea but

where did George come in? Remember his Ballet Mecanique?

He had to coordinate 16 player pianos and, in those pre-silicon

chip days, what better way to coordinate the changing of

frequencies in transmission than to use rolls of paper with slots in

them just like in a player piano. And why not use 88 different

frequencies, corresponding to the 88 keys on a piano? With the

encouragement of Charles Kettering, research director at General

Motors, and help from a professor at Cal Tech they worked up

the idea and patent number 2,292,387 on their “Secret

Communications System” was granted in August of 1942. You

won”t find the name Lamarr on the patent, Hedy having taken the

name of Markey, after another of her husbands. I”m not sure

which one.

Unfortunately for Antheil and Lamarr, they were not successful

in getting the Navy to adopt their idea. Part of the problem may

have been that Antheil made the mistake of trying to explain

their concept in terms of the player piano mechanism. Antheil

suspected that the Navy brass didn”t think piano-based hardware

could fit in a torpedo. However, he was sure that the whole

mechanism could be miniaturized. Hedy toyed with the idea of

quitting acting to promote the idea in order to help the fight

against the Nazis. Although she decided against that idea, she

certainly contributed to the war effort by using her acting talent

and beauty to sell war bonds, raising $7 million in one evening.

In those days, a million dollars was real money! Lamarr and

Antheil never profited from their patent, which expired in 1959.

But the Navy had not forgotten the idea. In 1962, during the

Cuban missile crisis, it used an electronic version of frequency

hopping for communications on the ships blockading Cuba.

During the 1960s, the concept of frequency hopping started to

catch on and gave birth to a broad field of communications

known as “spread spectrum”. Spread spectrum is simply the

spreading of a communication over a range of frequencies.

Today, frequency hopping and other forms of spread spectrum

communications are used not only for secure military

communications but also for your cellular phones, faxes and

various wireless applications. The number of frequencies is

controlled by the Federal Communications Commission, which

for some applications mandates that 75 or so different

frequencies be used. That”s not too far from Antheil”s 88

frequencies!

And Antheil”s musical work is still hanging around. Apparently,

early performances of his works were so controversial that riots

would ensue! In surfing the Web, I came across a site devoted to

the Ballet Mecanique and as recently as April, 2000, the work

was performed at Carnegie Hall in New York. One review by

Gabe Della Fave, published in the Mechanical Music Digest,

described the performance as “dull and boring” and decried the

use of electronic keyboards in place of the player pianos that

Antheil intended. However, for you music lovers, he described

the acoustics in Carnegie Hall as “..perfect and not to be missed”!

The information for this column came primarily from various

Web sites including invention .org, the site of the Inventors

Assistance League, or inventionconvention.com, site of the

Invention Services International Corporation. The latter

organization sponsors the “Bulbie” award, an invention award

given to Hedy Lamarr in 1997. This Bulbie award has also been

given to, among others, Paul MacCready, famed for his

contributions to human-powered and very light weight aircraft.

Perhaps I should mention that, in spite of “Ecstasy”, not one of

the Web sites I logged on to had a nude photograph of Hedy

Lamarr.

Allen F. Bortrum