Why Are We here?

Why Are We here?

Strange things are happening these days. Take the other day. On

my way down to Rutgers, I stopped at a red light and noticed that

the cars turning onto the road ahead were moving very slowly.

Then I saw the wild turkey. It had walked calmly to the

centerline and stopped there, standing like a statue, watching the

two lanes of traffic go by on either side. Finally, a lady stopped

her car, got out and shooed the bird to safety where it

immediately started grazing on the grass. This intersection is not

out in the country and how that turkey got there is a mystery to

me.

Believe it or not, there are other, bigger mysteries than whether

or not a young woman”s disappearance is connected to her

relationship with a member of our legislative branch. You would

never know it from the media attention, would you? One of

these really big mysteries appears to have been solved. It has to

do with our roots and I do mean roots that go back to the very

beginning. Which brings me to Erice, Sicily in July of 1988.

My wife and I were in this little walled town for two of the most

interesting weeks of my life.

I was a lecturer in a NATO-sponsored course on the topic of

“microbatteries”. The other lecturers and students were a truly

international group and we made a number of friends that we still

keep in touch with. Virtually none of the townspeople, waiters in

the restaurants or shopkeepers spoke English and, with nobody

fluent in Italian, it was an adventure dining out in the evening.

The highlight of the two weeks was a special celebration of the

25th anniversary of the center at which the course was held. The

center was started by a highly respected nuclear physicist named

Zichichi. We in the course were invited to attend the celebration.

We were surprised to see a goodly number of carabinieri in their

fancy uniforms, with guns at the ready, outside the building as

we entered.

The ceremony was in Italian or English depending on the

particular speaker”s choice, with no interpretation. However, I

became somewhat concerned when I heard the terms “Mafioso”

and “assassinado” used in Zichichi”s remarks. At that point, I

thought perhaps those carabinieri weren”t there just for show!

Indeed, it turned out that in the audience was the widow of a

former president of Sicily who was assassinated when he tried to

crack down on the Mafia. Not only that, but his brother was one

of the speakers. I admit to being somewhat relieved when the

ceremony was over without incident and we enjoyed a positively

sumptuous buffet afterward with lobster and other delicacies

fresh from the Mediterranean. If I”ve repeated this story, forgive

me. It is the season of summer reruns.

What does all this have to do with our roots? Well, there were

two Nobel Laureates at the ceremony. One was Tsung-Dao Lee

of Columbia University. I knew then that Lee had received the

Nobel Prize for something to do with “charge-parity” violation. I

didn”t realize the significance of his work then, however. This

charge-parity goes something like this. Say you look in the

mirror and there is your twin but everything is opposite; your left

is his right, etc. With charge parity, you expect that your twin

will behave in every respect just like you. For us humans, you

probably would think it highly unlikely.

However, let”s switch to particles of matter and antimatter. Think

of, for example, an electron with its negative charge. Its

antiparticle is the positron, which mirrors the electron and has a

positive charge. Virtually every ordinary particle has an

antiparticle like this. It was assumed in nuclear physics that the

antiparticle behaves exactly like its ordinary counterpart in a

mirror image kind of way. Tsung-Dao Lee shared the Nobel

Prize for showing that this was not necessarily true. This was a

big deal at the time.

Meanwhile, the Big Bang was being confirmed and some began

to wonder about why we and everything else around us are here

at all. In the Big Bang, there were equal amounts of ordinary

matter, the stuff of which we”re made, and antimatter. With

equal amounts of these two types of stuff, when they get

together, they annihilate each other and there”s nothing left!

So, after these billions of years, you”d think that the universe

would be completely empty. But here we are! Back in 1967,

Andrei Sakharov, the Russian physicist, suggested that the

reason for us being here is that charge-parity is violated and the

antimatter decays slightly faster than ordinary matter. This

would mean that before the two types of matter could get

together, much of the antistuff was gone, leaving the excess

ordinary stuff we see today. Sakharov was later in the news for

his political views in the old Soviet Union.

To try to detect the small differences between stuff and antistuff

is exceedingly difficult. Another Nobel was given in 1980 to a

couple of Brookhaven workers, James Cronin and Val Fitch, who

found evidence that a particle known as a K-meson and its anti

particle did show a difference in behavior. However, since that

time there was the question as to whether this K-meson may just

be a special case.

But there”s another kind of meson called the B-meson that”s about

10 times bigger than the K. I mentioned some time ago that a

good friend had taken us to visit the Stanford Linear Accelerator

Center (SLAC) in Stanford, California. It was positively

awesome to see the size and complexity of just a small part of

this facility. Well, they have what is essentially a B-meson

factory in a collider they nicknamed BaBar. BaBar turns out Bs

like crazy but these things only last a millionth of a second or so!

But, because they”re bigger than the K, it”s easier to follow the

decay and its products. The net result is that the statistics show a

very high probability that the antiparticle decays faster than the

ordinary B.

These results indicate that this charge-parity thing is violated for

at least two particles and their antiparticles. That makes

scientists a good deal more comfortable that other particles will

likely show the same effect. While the work isn”t the final word

by any means, this study seems the most convincing one to date.

I, for one, am certainly relieved to find that I”m here legitimately,

if only on a statistical basis!

Allen F. Bortrum