Jerusalem and Camp David, Part I

Jerusalem and Camp David, Part I

“The air over Jerusalem is saturated with prayers and dreams /

like the air over industrial cities. It”s hard to breathe.”

–Poet Yehuda Amichai

The recent Camp David peace talks broke up over the issue of

the future of Jerusalem. I must say up front, I have no respect for

Yassir Arafat nor the hard-line Palestinian leadership he

kowtows to. Israeli Prime Minister Barak went way beyond the

call of duty with the compromises he was prepared to make.

But, of course, there is still major doubt that the Israeli people,

themselves, would have approved any final agreement had one

been reached.

For the purposes of this two-part discussion, I will try and largely

limit the discourse to the history of the debate over Jerusalem,

giving both sides.

To set the stage, Newsweek”s Daniel Klaidman and Jeffrey

Bartholet describe the atmosphere in the city.

“(Jerusalem) is the theological battleground where Jews,

Muslims and Christians argue most fervently over whose God is

the True God, and whose history is the legitimate one. The

ground contains layer upon layer of envy and spite: Christian

monks of different denominations fight like schoolyard ruffians

over who gets to sweep which steps in the Church of the Holy

Sepulcher, where they believe Christ was crucified and

resurrected. Ultra-Orthodox Jews stone their secular brethren for

driving by their neighborhoods on the Sabbath. Conservative

Muslims try to rein in their daughters, who are sometimes

attracted to the social freedom on offer in secular, mostly Jewish

west Jerusalem.”

The pertinent history of Jerusalem spans some 3,000 years, going

back to the capture of the city by King David around 1000 BC.

About this time, Solomon built the first temple. The city was

destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar, c.587 BC, rebuilt by Herod The

Great, c. 35 BC, who built a second temple, which was destroyed

by the Roman Titus, in AD 70. The Jews were then forbidden

within city limits until the 5th century.

The Persians moved into Jerusalem, AD 614, only to be

conquered by the Seljuks in 1071, and the city was finally

occupied by the Ottoman Empire from 1244-1917.

In 1917 Jerusalem became the capital of the British -mandated

territory of Palestine. In 1948 the state of Israel was proclaimed

and Jerusalem was divided between Jordan (the east) and Israel

(the west).

[Back in 1947, a UN partition plan was to turn Palestine into

Arab and Jewish zones, in essence creating the very international

district recommended by some today. David Ben-Gurion

approved of the plan. But the Arab armies attacked instead.]

Finally, during the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel captured east

Jerusalem.

Jerusalem contains the holiest of sites. For Jews it is the Western

(or Wailing) Wall, the remains of the Second Temple built on

Mount Moriah after their return from exile in Babylon.

For Muslims, Jerusalem is the third holiest place, after Medina

and Mecca; more specifically, the plateau on the Temple Mount

above the Wailing Wall, known as the Haram al-Sharif, or noble

sanctuary. It is from here that the Prophet Muhammad ascended

to heaven and the throne of Allah. The spot is now marked by

the Dome of the Rock shrine and Al-Aksa Mosque.

Both Jews and Muslims share the belief that the “rock” is the

very site where Abraham offered his son for sacrifice.

Jerusalem also holds a special place in the hearts of Christians, of

course, because it is where Jesus suffered, died and rose again in

glory – and where he would return to judge the living and the

dead. The main site is the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, a short

distance from the Wailing Wall and Haram al-Sharif.

The New York Times Jane Perlez recently asked a Clinton

administration official to describe Jerusalem.

“Think of it as four concentric circles; outer suburbs, inner

suburbs, the Old City and the religious sites. As you move into

the center, the issues become more intense, historical, religious.”

And so this city of faith became the centerpiece of Camp David

II. John Lancaster summarized what each side sought at the

start of the talks, Jerusalem being but one issue.

Jerusalem: Palestinians wanted East Jerusalem to become the

Palestinian capital. The Israelis want the city to remain under

Israeli control, with a symbolic Palestinian role.

Borders and settlements: Palestinians sought total Israeli

withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza to the 1967 borders.

Israel wanted to keep about 10% of the West Bank, an area

which would then include the major settlements.

Refugees: Palestinians wanted Israel to accept responsibility for

refugees, to grant them a right to return and to compensate those

who can”t. [Compensation to be paid by the West.] Israelis feel

no real responsibility for the refugees and offered a minimal right

of return to allow some families to reunite.

Water: Palestinians want the final say over the use and

distribution of water flowing through the West Bank. Israelis seek

to maintain control of the aquifer which provides the nation with

a quarter of its water.

On the land front, as a follow-up to the 1993 Oslo Accords,

Israel had turned over control of most of Gaza and six West

Bank cities to the Palestinians by the end of 1995. Withdrawal

from Hebron was delayed until 1997, with the removal of the

majority of Israeli forces. In October 1998, Israel agreed to turn

over more West Bank territory. Phase III has yet to take place.

Former Soviet dissident and current member of the Israeli

parliament, Natan Sharansky, begins to describe one side of the

argument.

“Israel is not a normal country, nor will it ever be…The 1948

War of Independence and the 1967 Six-Day War transformed the

identity of Jews around the world and strengthened their

connection as one people. A peace process that entails

transferring biblical lands; determining the fate of a Jerusalem, to

which we have prayed for 3,000 years; and allowing even a

limited right of return of Palestinians to a country that is the

source of our pride and unity is a process that will also transform

our identity as a nation. It has the potential of dangerously

undermining our connection as one people.”

Next week, a lengthy discussion on what happened at Camp

David, why Arafat is to blame, and whether Barak can survive,

politically.

Sources: [For both Parts I and II]

Daniel Klaidman and Jeffrey Bartholet, Newsweek

Fouad Ajami, U.S. News

Terry Atlas and David Makovsky, U.S. News

Ethan Bonner, New York Times

Lee Hockstader, Washington Post

Natan Sharansky, Washington Post

Jim Hoagland, Washington Post

William Safire, New York Times

Richard Cohen, Washington Post

John Kifner, New York Times

Jane Perlez, New York Times

John Lancaster, Washington Post

Brian Trumbore