The Middle East…the Israeli View

The Middle East…the Israeli View

Last week I listed the “Statement of Understandings” that

resulted from the Arab Summit, as well as an opinion from one of

Egypt”s leading newspapers. This week, I thought I would take

advantage of some reports from Israel I have been forwarded by a

good friend of mine. In addition I have some other opinions from

the Israeli side.

The following is from Rabbi Micky Boyden in Israel, unedited.

Monday, Oct. 23

I thought I”d give you an update on events in Israel. Things are

not good here. A bus carrying Israeli soldiers today took a wrong

turn and mistakenly approached a checkpost (sic) where it was

fired upon by Palestinian policemen. Several of the Israelis were

injured. Palestinians are throwing rocks at an Israeli checkpost

on the edge of Kalkilya – not more than five miles from where I

live.

Our colleague, Jeff Bearman, lives in the Jerusalem suburb of

Gilo, which is being sporadically fired upon from Palestinian

controlled territory. Israel Radio said that helicopter gunships

were being used against the sources of these attacks.

El Al flight LY316 from London yesterday was reportedly full of

Israelis, but with few foreign visitors. The Sheraton Hotel in Tel

Aviv – and I am sure many others – has closed off certain floors

because of the fall-off in tourism. Late this afternoon a terrorist

bomb that had been placed in Ibn Gavirol Street in Tel Aviv was

successfully defused without injury.

Hizballah (ed. Hezbollah or Hizbollah are used more commonly in

the U.S. press) is calling on all Muslims to follow the way of the

Palestinian “martyrs” by carrying knives and using every possible

opportunity to kill Jews. The sermon delivered at the El Aksa

mosque on the Temple Mount today was used to enflame

Palestinians even further against Israel and to revive the Intifada.

I wish I could paint a prettier picture, but I would be kidding you.

Ehud Barak and Arik (Ariel) Sharon have just concluded a one-hour

private meeting alone to discuss the current situation. There was

no statement following the meeting.

The present violence has left many “peaceniks” very

disillusioned. No Israeli prime minister would or could have

offered more than Barak did to Yassir Arafat – indeed, it was

unclear whether Barak would be able to sell the deal to the Israeli

public at large. Nevertheless, Arafat rejected his proposals and

the Palestinian mob responded with violence. I think most Israelis

– although I have obviously not conducted a survey – now agree

that we do not currently have a partner with whom we can reach

a peace agreement. This is sad for Israel and sad for the

Palestinians. It leaves the future uncertain for us all.

Wednesday, October 25

As many of you know, the centre of attention in Israel has now

switched to the Jerusalem suburb of Gilo which has been under

repeated attack by gunfire from the adjoining Palestinian town of

Beit Jalla. Our colleague, Jeff Bearman, whom I spoke to this

evening, tells me that he and his wife are currently living in the

basement of their home for fear of attack. Two apartments in his

building have already been hit by Palestinian gunfire. After

repeated warnings, Israel responded today by firing two tank

shells at the buildings from which fire had been directed on the

civilian population of Gilo. [ed. I saw this action on BBC.]

Israel is deserted. Few tourists, except the most courageous (or,

some would say, foolhardy) are coming here these days. Hotels

have reduced staffing levels and the tourist industry is suffering

terribly. The unrest of two weeks ago between Arabs and Jews

within Israel proper has also left its scars. Jews are no longer

frequenting Arab cafes and restaurants or taking their cars to be

repaired at Arab garages. There is a general feeling of

disappointment with how many Arab citizens have behaved over

the past weeks. We are used to the Palestinian intifada, but did

not think that Arab Israelis would react so violently against the

forces of law and order in their own country. It will take a long

time to heal the wounds and reduce the level of animosity that has

been created.

The peace process that started at Oslo is seen by most Israelis as

being dead. And that is the tragedy, because if Arafat is not a

partner in the peace process, then who is? The peace camp in

Israel is disappointed and disillusioned. If there is no peace

process, then there is little that divides Labour from Likkud in

their respective security agendas and political strategies. In that

sense, Netanyahu was right, but I believe that, as opposed to the

Likkud strategy, we had to go the whole way to check out

whether our Palestinian neighbors were ready to make peace.

No one can say that Israel under Barak”s leadership did not try.

It is, therefore, now conceivable that Arik Sharon could join

forces with Barak in a government of national emergency even

though there are many in Barak”s present government that are

opposed to such a move. The question that most Israelis are

currently asking themselves is “What now?” And the tragedy is

that there are few ready answers. It may just be that there are

some issues that are unresolvable and that the Israeli / Palestinian

conflict will just have to continue dogging us for the years ahead.

As things stand today, Barak would appear to have little chance

of winning an election were one to take place at this time. After

all, his peace initiative has failed. However, maybe the time has

now come for a change of agendas and a realigning of political

forces with Labour and Likkud working together to address the

various social, economic and religious issues that confront Israeli

society.

Micky Boyden

Excerpts from an op-ed piece by Natan Sharansky, opposition

member of parliament, which appeared in Monday”s Wall Street

Journal.

“What appears to have caught those dreaming of a quick solution

to the conflict completely by surprise is the depth of hatred that

the Palestinians evince toward Israel. The animalistic mutilation

of our soldiers and the calls of ”Death to the Jews” that are now

echoed in the Arab world have raised eyebrows of even the most

ardent supporters of compromise. Unfortunately, most of those

taken aback by recent events have focused attention on the

symptoms rather than the disease.

“Long ago, Andrei Sakharov taught me that a society that does

not respect the rights of its own citizens will never respect the

rights of its neighbors. The reasons for this are simple.

Democratic leaders are dependent for their rule on the will of a

free people and as such have a vested interest in promoting the

peace and prosperity that all free societies desire…

“Leaders of authoritarian regimes, on the other hand, aren”t

beholden to an electorate and devote their energies to controlling

the minds and bodies of their subjects in order to maintain and

consolidate power.

“…countries with cultures as diverse as the former Soviet Union,

Cuba, North Korea and Iraq all share one thing – hate.

“While the West coddled him…(Arafat) has used every means at

his disposal, from the Palestinian-controlled media to newly

printed textbooks, to speeches by his own wife, to inculcate

hatred of the Jews and their state.”

Recent statements from Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

“Even if there is a delay, peace will be achieved. It is not we who

chose the path of violence, it was the choice of Arafat and the

Palestinian leadership.”

“We were ready to consider an unprecedented compromise with

the Palestinians. We understood that peace, if achieved, would

carry a price that would be painful and heartbreaking, but never

will we agree to peace at any price, a peace that means giving in

to all the demands of the other side.”

Brian Trumbore