Joseph Granville

Joseph Granville

Joe Granville. Ah yes, his name brings back memories of the days

when I first became aware of this mystical animal called Wall

Street. Born in 1923, Granville”s mother was an heiress and his

father was a banker who had lost everything in the 1929 crash.

Little Joe went off to major in economics at Duke, where he

studied waves and cycles. During World War II he was stationed

in the Marshall Islands when the atomic bombs were dropped on

Japan and some would say this experience had something to do

with his propensity to be bearish. After leaving the service he

hosted a radio show in Kansas City and wrote two books on

stamp collecting. Later he attempted to become a stockbroker

but he failed the test, however E.F. Hutton hired him on a trial

basis to produce a market newsletter which he started in 1957.

By 1964 he was tired of the corporate world and he went off on

his own to start his own investment letter. By the early ”70s he

was broke.

[Before we get into the eccentric side of Joe Granville, it”s

important to note that Joe wrote some of the definitive papers on

technical analysis. He properly deserves his place among the

better known technicians of the later part of the 20th century. But

he won”t get it because he”s such a jerk].

After some erroneous forecasts in the early ”70s, however, by the

mid-”70s he was in sync with the market. He began to receive a

following for his market acumen and then Joe Granville, the

showman, took over.

Granville became a big fixture on the lecture circuit. Among the

many things he did was wear wild sport coats and slick hair-do”s,

once dropping his pants to read stock quotes printed on

underwear. At other times he dressed like Moses and read the

Ten Commandments of Investing, inviting the audience to “touch

me and be wealthy.”

From 1979-81 Joe called every major move in the stock market.

For example he issued a buy signal on 4/21/80 with the Dow at

759. The next day the Dow responded with its 5th biggest one-

day gain in history as it closed at 789, on its way to 974 by

9/22/80. On 9/23/81 he was in London and, appearing on a BBC

radio program, forecast big declines for markets in Europe, Japan

and the U.S. The following day markets overseas swooned and the

Dow fell 2.5%, intraday, before recovering at the close. The

Washington Post ran the headline, “One Forecaster Spurs

Hysteria.” Business Week called the one-day event, “A mindless

wave of selling that destroyed billions of dollars in stock value

from a forecaster who drops his pants in public to get attention.”

[Source: “The Bear Book,” by John Rothchild]

Granville told Newsweek around this time “Many have said I

have 4 times the power of the Federal Reserve.” He predicted he

would win the Nobel Prize.

But in the summer of ”82 stocks hit bottom, 8/12/82.to be

exact, Dow 776, and the markets began to rally, ferociously, as

Fed Chairman Paul Volcker began to cut interest rates in an

attempt to stimulate a moribund economy. Just two months later,

10/11/82, the Dow stood at 1012 for a pickup of 30%. Granville

remained bearish. At one lecture he emerged from a coffin, too

drunk to talk. He called for a crash worse than 1929. Appearing

on Wall Street Week, he called Louis Rukeyser “Crab Louis” for

making light of his predictions.

Granville remained bearish for much of the ”80s and his subscriber

base plummeted. He turned bullish in time for the ”87 crash. And

while he did well, post-crash through 1989, Mark Hulbert rated

him dead last among newsletter writers for the 12 years ending

1996.

Today, he is still bearish (and, as of this writing, probably feeling

smug again). But, to remember the “good” Granville, here are

some snippets from his early writings on technical analysis and the

markets.

“There are very few ”accidents” in the stock market. When a

stock advances or declines there is a reason behind the move. It

is not the primary concern of a market technician to determine

what the reason is, the assumption being that there is always a

reason. The technician is primarily concerned with timing, when

a stock moves rather than why it moves.”

Granville did a lot of work comparing the movement of stock

prices to movements in music, like a classical piece by Bach or

Beethoven. Unfortunately, for this forum, I would need to post

some bars of music which I am unable to do. Anyway, seeing as

the market is currently declining as he predicted, let”s close with

Chairman Joe and his thoughts on why stocks go down, or, to put

it the way Joe does, “It takes more energy to go up than down.”

“A stock can fall more quickly than it rises by merely the turning

off of the faucet of upside energy leaving nothing left except the

natural law of gravity to predominate. It was there all the time

but it took constant upside energy exerted to overcome it. Remove it

and the price would have to fall of its own accord.”

[Source: “The Book of Investing Wisdom,” edited by Peter

Krass]

Brian Trumbore