Charles Keating, Part I

Charles Keating, Part I

Charles Keating is the leading figure in what can safely be called

the largest banking scandal in history. While figures vary, the

estimated total cost to taxpayers is in the neighborhood of $500

billion.

Keating was a championship swimmer, a World War II fighter

pilot and, later, a fruit stand owner, before he received his law

degree. In Cincinnati, he launched a crusade against pornography

and Hustler magazine”s Larry Flynt in particular. Keating then

became counsel to one of the earliest takeover artists, Carl

Lindner. In 1978, Keating purchased a large house-building

company from Lindner whose name he changed to American

Continental.

Meanwhile, the principle of savings and loans (or building and

loans as they were called in the times of “It”s a Wonderful Life”

and Bedford Falls) was to take short-term deposits and use them

to make long-term loans or mortgages. The savings and loan

industry was created by Congress back in 1932 and for decades

the system worked. The disparity between short and long-term

interest rates was small.

All of that changed, however, when the Federal Reserve acted in

the late 1970s to push up interest rates in an effort to tame

inflation. The S&Ls were then forced to pay more for deposits

than their mortgage portfolios were yielding. At the same time

the advent of the money market mutual fund provided stiff

competition and folks began to withdraw their money from the

banks. The industry then had to sell assets at a loss.

Senator Jake Garn, who later introduced legislation in an attempt

to help the S&Ls out, said of the time, “I don”t think that most of

us really understood just how serious the problem was. When we

began to realize how big it was, we did not have the resources to

handle it.”

In 1980 Congress deregulated the interest rates that depository

institutions could pay on deposits. Then, President Jimmy Carter

increased the guarantee on a bank deposit from $40,000 to

$100,000. Both moves were designed to help the industry.

But the hemorrhaging continued and hundreds of S&Ls failed. In

October, 1982, Garn and Rep. Fernand St. Germain introduced

legislation that allowed the thrifts to invest 40% of their assets in

other businesses. The idea was to let the industry diversify its

portfolio in an attempt to shore up their finances. Some states

went even further. California-chartered thrifts could invest

wherever they liked and it would all be federally insured. Many

of the S&Ls then lost millions when they speculated on race

horses, windmill farms, exotic financial instruments and chancy

real estate ventures.

While this was going on, you would think that there would have

been increased scrutiny of the banks and their practices,

particularly since the government was now on the hook for

$100,000 an account. But one of Ronald Reagan”s mistakes was

to not add funds for more, and better trained, regulators. The

system was set up to be abused by the likes of Charles Keating.

With the help of Michael Milken (see the “Wall Street History”

archives), in 1982 Keating acquired Lincoln Savings and Loan of

Irvine, California. From his headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona, he

proceeded to go on a building spree – 8 luxury homes a day, a

$300 million hotel (the Phoenician..and a great place it

is.thanks, Charles), and massive office complexes.

What was Keating like? He has been labeled an “unpredictable

force of nature,” who used to walk through his companies

dropping pink slips on executive desks, or firing someone for not

wearing the required dark suit (which considering this was the

Southwest, wasn”t real considerate when you factor in the heat).

On an impulse he would give a secretary $500 in cash with the

stipulation that it had to be spent in 20 minutes. On Bahamian

island, every mother who named a son Charles received $100.

[George Foreman missed out. Since he names all of his sons

George, if he had named them Charles he may have qualified for

$700 or so.but I digress.]

Keating was also a generous man, but with corporate, not his

own funds. He gave $6 million to charity and even flew Mother

Teresa around in his jet. And he was generous to his family,

wouldn”t you know. Family members, including himself, received

about $42 million in salaries and benefits in the five years he ran

Lincoln.

By 1988, Keating had about $5 billion in deposits which, in the

words of Harold Evans, he “whisked around the world, booking

”profits” to the tune of 42% until people began to realize the

profits were prodigious losses.”

Regulators began to take notice and attempted to crack down but

they were met by an all-out legal and political onslaught. Keating

had about 80 teams of lawyers, including (as was discussed in an

earlier piece), Alan Greenspan, who was paid $40,000 to write

some papers to regulators, basically saying that “(Lincoln)

presents no foreseeable risk to the government.” [By the way, of

the 17 S&Ls that Greenspan was asked to comment on before

Congress, 16 failed and the survivor was not a S&L. But nooo,

he knows what he”s doing when it comes to today”s economy!]

And, as I mentioned above, the regulators were overmatched.

Keating was so brazen he even offered jobs to some of the very

regulators and examiners who were working his case. Many of

them were toiling at $14,000 salaries. Who wouldn”t want to lie

around the Phoenician, checking out the four pools and the action

around them (but I digress). One fellow, a man heavily in debt to

Lincoln, was appointed as commissioner to the Bank Board, the

body ultimately responsible for regulating Lincoln”s affairs.

Next week, the regulators win out.and the role of The Keating

Five.

Sources: “The American Century,” Harold Evans

“Money, Greed & Risk,” Charles Morris

“Devil Take the Hindmost,” Edward Chancellor

“The New York Times Century of Business,”

Floyd Norris and Christine Bockelmann

Brian Trumbore